Hi Christian,Thanks for your efforts for reproduction.I will bring this topic to the team meeting tomorrow (https://meetings.opendev.org/#Neutron_Team_Meeting ):
Regarding your frustration, I totally understand it. It is, I think can be a topic for the coming PTG.
1) First thanks again for raising issue of a lack of maintainers
for VPNaaS at https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/networking/2022/networking.2022-03-22-14.06.log.html#l-62.
Were there any more take-aways from your PTG discussion if I may
ask?
Is there any chance anybody might look at our reported and
DevStack-reproduced issue about the duplicate IPtable rules
(https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1943449) ?
Do you need more info of any kind?
2) If there is a way forward for keeping VPNaaS ...
* Will OVN receive support at some point? https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/neutron-vpnaas/+/765353
3) More protocols?
Are there any plans on extending on the types as currently only
IPSEC is supported
(https://opendev.org/openstack/neutron-vpnaas/src/branch/master/neutron_vpnaas/services/vpn/device_drivers).
I was thinking about Wireguard which is also built into the linux
kernel and saw amazing pick-up in recent times. Even consumer
devices use it now as it's MUCH simpler than IPSEC.
Regards
Christian