Arne Wiebalck <Arne.Wiebalck@cern.ch> 于2023年2月3日周五 01:05写道：
Hi!
Here at CERN we do not have separate Ironic controllers for ARM, but we do not use the standard Ironic tftp setup either: we have an "Ironic external" PXE/tftp service we rely on. What you will need to make sure, though, is that you indeed serve architecture dependent files via tftp. If I remember correctly, we do this via the architecture/firmware information that is sent with the initial DHCP request, and an if statementThank you so much. somewhere :)
(We should write a blog post with all the details, but I am happy to dig out the details on how this works before -- if you think this would be useful for you?)
Thank you so much, that would be great. But actually, I would do this follow the steps in the installation documentation[1] which were mentioned by Julia Kreger. I need to prioritize the project native content as much as possible. So this blog I can only be a reference, will not follow it completely.I don't want to waste your time, I hope you don't write because of my needs. But if you think he's useful and available for the project, as someone who doesn't know much about ironic, [1] https://files.openstack.org/docs/ironic/victoria/install/configure-pxe.html#...
Cheers, Arne
-- Arne Wiebalck CERN IT
________________________________________ From: 韩光宇 <hanguangyu2@gmail.com> Sent: Thursday, 2 February 2023 17:32 To: openstack-discuss Subject: [ironic]Could I use x86 ironic to deploy arm bare metal node?
Hi,
I deploy ironic in x86 env, could I use it to deploy arm bare metal node?
My concern is mainly whether the files transferred in the tftp phase of PXE cannot be cross-architecture.
Do I need to deploy a dedicated arm-architecture ironic-conductor node for arm-architecture bare metal nodes?
Thanks