I noticed that eventlet removal meeting is independent from
the oslo meeting proposed in this thread. I'm ok to have dedicated
slot to discuss oslo specific topics but may need to have clear scope
definition. (Since it was mentioned that eventlet removal is the core
topic we want to discuss in this meeting, right ?).
Oslo meetings are Oslo meetings, isn't the lifecycle of Oslo and the Oslo deliverables a clear scope? Oslo owns more than 40 deliverables, I don't think it would be difficult to find Oslo things to discuss. Another option would be to follow the series agenda, and to base our Oslo meetings over the series lifecycle (milestones, FF, etc.).
Concerning Eventlet. Eventlet may impact Oslo in some ways, but Oslo meetings are not the right place to host all the Eventlet discussions. Eventlet discussions will cover a wide range of topics, from neutron, to packaging, passing by requirements, and surely also Oslo at some points, so I don't think Oslo meetings is the right place.
Nova, Neutron, Glance and surely many other deliverables already have internal discussions about Eventlet in their own IRC meetings, IMO Oslo should follow the same path.
Regarding the time slot, EMEA/NA slots might work better for me because
I can join these after I settle down my own things, but I think it's
generally got to have more Asia friendly slots if anyone from Asia
(especially east-Asia) is interested in joining us.
You are the chair [1] of the Oslo meeting, so "joining us" mostly means "joining you". Asia time slots are before EMEA/NA so if you have your "own things before", my question is: would you be able to join and manage the Asia time slot? If your answer is no, IMO, it is useless to propose an Asia time slot, as people will wait for the meeting chair.
It is up to you.
On 10/31/24 7:07 PM, dbengt@redhat.com wrote:
>
>
> On 10/30/24 5:57 PM, Ghanshyam Mann <gmann@ghanshyammann.com> wrote:
>> ++ on alternate TZ meetings, and that way, EU and Asia TZ can be covered in one of the meetings.
>> To keep it simple, we can have separate doodle poll for each TZ meeting.
> Ok so maybe instead we can have one meeting per week. As you proposed like one for the Europeean and Asia and one for the us? I have create a first UTC pool here[1] afternoon and here[2] you have the morning one.
>
> [1] https://www.vyte.in/e/1cnp51e4sd [2] https://www.vyte.in/e/2j0to257cd
>