Mohammed Naser <mnaser@vexxhost.com> writes:
> On Fri, May 31, 2019 at 8:35 AM Jonathan D. Proulx <jon@csail.mit.edu> wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, May 31, 2019 at 07:50:45AM -0400, Doug Hellmann wrote:
>>
>> :My vote is a hard "no" on an openstack-operators/ namespace because I'm
>> :tired of perpetuating the idea that "operators" cannot (or should not)
>> :be "contributors" to openstack/. They *must* be contributors, because
>> :that's the only way open source works over the log term.
>>
>> what Doug said!
>>
>> The most important and perhaps most difficult thing in OpenSource is
>> the bravery to be bad in public. This is why the worst thing in
>> OpenSource is shaming people for being bad in public.
>
> That sounds fair. It seems there is significant thoughts from within
> the community
> that this should continue to live under the openstack/ namespace.
>
> How do we make this happen then? I'm struggling to find the correct platform to
> put this under in order to make this live under openstack/
What part is hard, defining an owner?
Yes. A SIG? A WG?
I'm not sure where to put it under to make it official under OpenStack namespace.
I'm happy to hear suggestions