On Fri., May 31, 2019, 9:49 a.m. Doug Hellmann, <doug@doughellmann.com> wrote:
Mohammed Naser <mnaser@vexxhost.com> writes:
On Fri, May 31, 2019 at 8:35 AM Jonathan D. Proulx <jon@csail.mit.edu> wrote:
On Fri, May 31, 2019 at 07:50:45AM -0400, Doug Hellmann wrote:
:My vote is a hard "no" on an openstack-operators/ namespace because I'm :tired of perpetuating the idea that "operators" cannot (or should not) :be "contributors" to openstack/. They *must* be contributors, because :that's the only way open source works over the log term.
what Doug said!
The most important and perhaps most difficult thing in OpenSource is the bravery to be bad in public. This is why the worst thing in OpenSource is shaming people for being bad in public.
That sounds fair. It seems there is significant thoughts from within the community that this should continue to live under the openstack/ namespace.
How do we make this happen then? I'm struggling to find the correct platform to put this under in order to make this live under openstack/
What part is hard, defining an owner?
Yes. A SIG? A WG? I'm not sure where to put it under to make it official under OpenStack namespace. I'm happy to hear suggestions --
Doug