Re: [all] Any good alternatives to uwsgi?

Yeah. We tried hard to make both Swift and Glance use uwsgi, but these services simply fail in very subtle ways. It's not obvious that they fail at first, but they really do. I very much believe this is a defect in both projects, and that they should invest time working on this.

Glance runs under uwsgi in the gate, and it works fine with all the features (like import) enabled. There are still some -standalone jobs that run it by itself as well. If you find issues, be sure to file bugs (and let me know). --Dan