On Fri, Nov 22, 2019 at 3:50 AM Witek Bedyk <witold.bedyk@suse.com> wrote:
On 11/21/19 9:53 PM, Nate Johnston wrote:
I know several very large sites (ingesting billions of records per day) that run community InfluxDB and they get HA by putting influx-proxy [1] in front of it. I've evaluated it for large scale uses before as well, and with influx-proxy I found no need for the clustering option.
Similar architecture is followed by Monasca. InfluxDB instances can be assigned to different Kafka consumer groups and consume messages independently from the message queue. In case one of the instances is down all the measurements are still buffered and get persisted as soon as the instance is available again.
I'm curious on what the final decision of the Ceilometer team regarding this discussion?
Best greetings Witek