Thanks Daniel, I know the churn in the requirements is annoying but I think we're ending up in a better place.

-Jay


On Thu, Jan 23, 2025 at 4:39 AM Daniel Bengtsson <dbengt@redhat.com> wrote:


On 2025-01-21 22:05, Mike Bayer wrote:
> The above was surprising considering that this was supposed to be a decision that had already been made at PTG, yet there still seems to be disagreement as though the decision were not actually made in any final way.
I have updated the patch to hardcode the value.

--
Daniel Bengtsson
Software engineer