At the very least I'd say that the wsgi server used in projects should
be standardized and be part of PTI. Previous TC meeting was already
hot and full of time-consuming topics, so I've added uwsgi topic for
the next meeting agenda.
I'm not exactly asking for a standard wsgi server across the service projects, I'm first inclined to sit down with all the projects team members and come up with a discussion about the uswsgi support.
anyway, happy to hear the TC is taking the ball.
чт, 23 февр. 2023 г. в 10:21, Sylvain Bauza <sylvain.bauza@gmail.com>:
>
>
>
> Le jeu. 23 févr. 2023 à 09:30, Thomas Goirand <zigo@debian.org> a écrit :
>>
>> On 2/22/23 22:55, Pete Zaitcev wrote:
>> > On Wed, 22 Feb 2023 11:14:24 +0100
>> > Thomas Goirand <zigo@debian.org> wrote:
>> >
>> >> It's been a few Debian release that all OpenStack APIs are served using
>> >> uwsgi. Unfortunately:
>> >
>> > Swift uses eventlet, doesn't it?
>> >
>> > -- Pete
>>
>> Yeah. We tried hard to make both Swift and Glance use uwsgi, but these
>> services simply fail in very subtle ways. It's not obvious that they
>> fail at first, but they really do. I very much believe this is a defect
>> in both projects, and that they should invest time working on this.
>>
>> Anyways, for the time being, I believe I'll continue using uwsgi for as
>> long as the project is still in maintenance mode. Uwsgi is by far the
>> best, as much as I can tell.
>>
>
> Shouldn't we somehow identify whether DevStack is at risk given our hard dependency on uwsgi and should we as service project teams somehow kick-off some coordinated brainstorming efforts to identify the risks and mitigate them ?
>
> Sounds a goal to me.
>
>> Cheers,
>>
>> Thomas Goirand (zigo)
>>
>>