12 Jun
2024
12 Jun
'24
9:39 a.m.
On 2024-06-12 11:11, Herve Beraud wrote:
Maintaining the binding would allow us to monitor if Cotyledon needs help at some point. Maintaining a binding would simplify the migration. Maintaining a binding could merge the best of both worlds in many aspects. I agree with you. Keep oslo.service and use as a binding to cotyledon and futurist seems the best idea. Simplify a lot potential problem mentioned before.
-- Daniel Bengtsson Software Engineer