Hi, Brian Is OVN only one option for Neutron now? The old blueprint is obsoleted because nobody will do this, I don't think it has been almost done. -----邮件原件----- 发件人: Brian Haley [mailto:haleyb.dev@gmail.com] 发送时间: 2021年6月18日 10:16 收件人: Slawek Kaplonski <skaplons@redhat.com>; miguel@mlavalle.com; amotoki@gmail.com; YAMAMOTO Takashi <yamamoto@midokura.com>; ralonsoh@redhat.com; Nate Johnson <njohnson@redhat.com> 抄送: openstack-discuss@lists.openstack.org 主题: [lists.openstack.org代发]Re: [neutron] Drivers meeting agenda for 18.06.2021 Hi Slawek, I will not be able to attend the meeting tomorrow, have a conflicting appointment, notes on the two RFEs below. On 6/17/21 9:01 AM, Slawek Kaplonski wrote:
Hi,
Agenda for tomorrow's drivers meeting is at [1]. We have one new RFE to discuss [2] - It's another approach to do OpenFlow based DVR :) We have also one new RFE [3] which I would like You to check and help triaging before we will discuss it in the drivers meeting.
[1] https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/NeutronDrivers#Agenda [2] https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1931953
(Openflow-based DVR L3) As Liu mentioned in the bug, there was a spec/blueprint/almost-implementation before we decided to adopt OVN as the flow-based DVR option. While I can understand the desire to want to have less hops in ML2/OVS/DVR, we made the decision to invest in OVN going forward, so I don't think we should take on this work.
(Off-path SmartNIC Port Binding) From a high-level I'm fine with this, I'm sure Rodolfo will have more questions :) After reading the Nova spec Sean asked a good question - is there a requirement on the core OVN code to support this? I'll add that to the bug (done). -Brian