---- On Mon, 09 Mar 2020 13:19:32 -0500 Brian Rosmaita <rosmaita.fossdev@gmail.com> wrote ----
> On 3/6/20 6:12 PM, Goutham Pacha Ravi wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Mar 5, 2020 at 11:53 AM Brian Rosmaita
> > <rosmaita.fossdev@gmail.com <mailto:rosmaita.fossdev@gmail.com>> wrote:
> >
> > On 3/4/20 5:40 PM, Ghanshyam Mann wrote:
> > > ---- On Wed, 04 Mar 2020 13:53:00 -0600 Brian Rosmaita
> > <rosmaita.fossdev@gmail.com <mailto:rosmaita.fossdev@gmail.com>>
> > wrote ----
> > > > Hello QA team and devstack-plugin-ceph-core people,
> > > >
> > > > The Cinder team has some proposals we'd like to float.
> > > >
> > > > 1. The Cinder team is interested in becoming more active in the
> > > > maintenance of openstack/devstack-plugin-ceph [0].
> > Currently, the
> > > > devstack-plugin-ceph-core is
> > > > https://review.opendev.org/#/admin/groups/1196,members
> > > > The cinder-core is already represented by Eric and Sean; we'd
> > like to
> > > > replace them by including the cinder-core group.
> > >
> > > +1. This is good diea and make sense, I will do the change.
> >
> > Great, thanks!
> >
> >
> >
> > I agree this is a great idea to have more members of Cinder joining the
> > devstack-plugin-ceph team. I would like to have atleast a sub team of
> > manila core reviewers added to this project if it makes sense. The
> > Manila CephFS drivers (cephfs-native and cephfs-nfs) are currently being
> > tested with the help of the devstack integration in devstack-plugin-ceph.
> >
> > We have Tom Barron (tbarron) in the team, i'd like to propose myself
> > (gouthamr) and Victoria Martinez de la Cruz (vkmc)
> >
> > Please let me know what you think of the idea.
>
> I've got no objection from the Cinder side. I would also not object to
> adding the manila-core group instead of individuals. It's certainly in
> your team's interest to keep this thing stable and working, just as it
> is for the Cinder team.
Agree, I think adding manila group will be helpful, let me know if ok for you
and accordinfgly I will make changes.
Sure thing, works for me. Thanks Brian and Ghanshyam.
-gmann
>
> >
> > > >
> > > > 2. The Cinder team is interested in becoming more active in the
> > > > maintenance of x/devstack-plugin-nfs [1]. Currently, the
> > > > devstack-plugin-nfs-core is
> > > > https://review.opendev.org/#/admin/groups/1330,members
> > > > It's already 75% cinder-core members; we'd like to replace the
> > > > individual members with the cinder-core group. We also
> > propose that
> > > > devstack-core be added as an included group.
> > > >
> > > > 3. The Cinder team is interested in implementing a new
> > devstack plugin:
> > > > openstack/devstack-plugin-open-cas
> > > > This will enable thorough testing of a new feature [2] being
> > introduced
> > > > as experimental in Ussuri and expected to be finalized in
> > Victoria. Our
> > > > plan would be to make both cinder-core and devstack-core
> > included groups
> > > > for the gerrit group governing the new plugin.
> > >
> > > +1. You want this under Cinder governance or under QA ?
> >
> > I think it makes sense for these to be under QA governance -- QA would
> > own the repo with both QA and Cinder having permission to make changes.
> >
> > > >
> > > > 4. This is a minor point, but can the devstack-plugin-nfs
> > repo be moved
> > > > back into the 'openstack' namespace?
> > >
> > > If this is usable plugin for nfs testing (I am not aware if we
> > have any other) then
> > > it make sense to bring it to openstack governance.
> > > Same question here, do you want to put this under Cinder
> > governance or QA.
> >
> > Same here, I think QA should "own" the repo, but Cinder will have
> > permission to make changes there.
> >
> > >
> > > Those plugins under QA governance also ok for me with your
> > proposal of calloborative maintainance by
> > > devstack-core and cinder-core.
> > >
> > > -gmann
> >
> > Thanks for the quick response!
> >
> > > >
> > > > Let us know which of these proposals you find acceptable.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > [0] https://opendev.org/openstack/devstack-plugin-ceph
> > > > [1] https://opendev.org/x/devstack-plugin-nfs
> > > > [2]
> > https://blueprints.launchpad.net/cinder/+spec/support-volume-local-cache
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
>
>
>