Hi,

So we all stay on the same page, the four branches were removed by the infra team. Thanks!. This is the conversation we had in regards to the feature/lbaasv2 branch, where we agreed tht it was not necessary to save any state: http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/irclogs/%23openstack-infra/%23openstack-infra.2019-09-06.log.html#t2019-09-06T23:07:35

Cheers

On Fri, Sep 6, 2019 at 5:58 PM Jeremy Stanley <fungi@yuggoth.org> wrote:

On 2019-09-06 13:24:44 -0500 (-0500), Miguel Lavalle wrote:
> We have decided to remove from the Neutron repo the following feature
> branches:
>
> feature/graphql
> feature/lbaasv2
> feature/pecan
> feature/qos
>
> We don't need to preserve any state from these branches. In the case of the
> first one, no code was merged. The work in the other three branches is
> already merged into master.

Sanity-checking feature/lbaasv2, `git merge-base` between it and
master suggest cc400e2 is the closest common ancestor. There are 4
potentially substantive commits on feature/lbaasv2 past that point
which do not seem to appear in the master branch history:

7147389 Implement Jinja templates for haproxy config
cfa4a86 Tests for extension, db and plugin for LBaaS V2
02c01a3 Plugin/DB additions for version 2 of LBaaS API
4ed8862 New extension for version 2 of LBaaS API

Do you happen to know whether these need to be preserved (or what
happened with them)?
--
Jeremy Stanley