Hi, We are mainly focus on Ironic, we put the DB topics a little bit aside. Sorry. Jean-Daniel Bonnetot ovh.com <http://ovh.com> | @pilgrimstack On 11/02/2019 16:51, "Thierry Carrez" <thierry@openstack.org> wrote: Lingxian Kong wrote: > On Sun, Feb 10, 2019 at 7:04 AM Darek Król <dkrol3@gmail.com > <mailto:dkrol3@gmail.com>> wrote: > > Hello Lingxian, > > I’ve heard about a few tries of running Trove in production. > Unfortunately, I didn’t have opportunity to get details about > networking. At Samsung, we introducing Trove into our products for > on-premise cloud platforms. However, I cannot share too many details > about it, besides it is oriented towards performance and security is > not a concern. Hence, the networking is very basic without any > layers of abstractions if possible. > > Could you share more details about your topology and goals you want > to achieve in Trove ? Maybe Trove team could help you in this ? > Unfortunately, I’m not a network expert so I would need to get more > details to understand your use case better. > > > Yeah, I think trove team could definitely help. I've been working on a > patch[1] to support different sgs for different type of neutron ports, > the patch is for the use case that `CONF.default_neutron_networks` is > configured as trove management network. > > Besides, I also have some patches[2][3] for trove need to be reviewed, > not sure who are the right people I should ask for review now, but would > appriciate if you could help. I think OVH has been deploying Trove as well, or at least considering it... Ccing Jean-Daniel in case he can bring some insights on that. -- Thierry