On 11/30/18 4:05 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote:
Ghanshyam Mann wrote:
---- On Fri, 30 Nov 2018 14:29:24 +0900 Duc Truong <duc.openstack@gmail.com> wrote ---- > On Thu, Nov 29, 2018 at 6:39 PM Ghanshyam Mann <gmann@ghanshyammann.com> wrote: > > > > > > * devstack-vagrant: never released, no change over the past year. Is it > > > > meant to be released in the future (cycle-independent) or considered > > > > continuously published (release-management:none) or should it be retired ? > > > > > > > I am ok to retire this based on no one using it. > > I actually use devstack-vagrant and find it useful to setup consistent > devstack environments with minimal effort.
Ok, then we can keep that. I will be happy to add you as maintainer of that if you would like to. I saw you have done some commit and review in Tempest and will be good to have you as devstack-vagrant .
OK so in summary:
eslint-config-openstack, karma-subunit-reporter, devstack-tools -> should be considered cycle-independent (with older releases history imported). Any future release would be done through openstack/releases
devstack-vagrant -> does not need releases or release management, will be marked release-management:none in governance
devstack-plugin-ceph -> does not need releases or cycle-related branching, so will be marked release-management:none in governance
Other devstack-plugins maintainers should pick whether they need to be branched every cycle or not. Oslo-maintained plugins like devstack-plugin-zmq and devstack-plugin-pika will, for example.
Oh right, those exist too. :-) Both the zmq and pika drivers have been removed from oslo.messaging so those two repos can actually be retired once we no longer ci releases that contain the drivers. In the meantime there isn't any need to branch them since there isn't any development going on. Not sure whether that affects your plans but I thought I should clarify our plans for those two repos.
Unless someone objects, I'll push the related changes where needed. Thanks for the clarification !