On Fri, Mar 18, 2022 at 5:40 PM Jiri Podivin <jpodivin@redhat.com> wrote:

I suppose the corresponding rdo distgit branches will follow suit?

Once again most of the open reviews[6] are backports.

[6]https://review.rdoproject.org/r/q/branch:ussuri-rdo+status:open

well those won't be removed as part of https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/834049 - that will only remove the source code branches. 

However indeed the rdo team will likely want to remove the corresponding distgit for each of the tripleo repos being eol for ussuri after we move forward.

At this point I think we'll probably hold on this until ptg which is just under 2 weeks away but I haven't heard any pushback against this proposal so far,

marios

 

On Fri, Mar 18, 2022 at 4:35 PM Marios Andreou <marios@redhat.com> wrote:

On Thu, Mar 17, 2022 at 9:20 AM Jiri Podivin <jpodivin@redhat.com> wrote:

Hi,

As far as Tripleo-Validations repo[5] is concerned I don't believe we should see any issues.

For the most part we are treating the stable/ussuri branch as a necessary, but not very meaningful, step when backporting changes to stable/train.

[5]https://review.opendev.org/admin/repos/openstack/tripleo-validations

thanks for confirming Jirka

so assuming we go ahead with this we will at some point need to close all open reviews against stable ussuri - there aren't too many as we would expect (just things being backported - validations has 3 currently). For convenience, links for all the repos:

https://review.opendev.org/q/project:openstack%252Fos-apply-config+status:open+branch:stable/ussuri
https://review.opendev.org/q/project:openstack%252Fos-collect-config+status:open+branch:stable/ussuri
https://review.opendev.org/q/project:openstack%252Fos-net-config+status:open+branch:stable/ussuri
https://review.opendev.org/q/project:openstack%252Fos-refresh-config+status:open+branch:stable/ussuri
https://review.opendev.org/q/project:openstack%252Fpaunch+status:open+branch:stable/ussuri
https://review.opendev.org/q/project:openstack%252Fpuppet-tripleo+status:open+branch:stable/ussuri
https://review.opendev.org/q/project:openstack%252Fpython-tripleoclient+status:open+branch:stable/ussuri
https://review.opendev.org/q/project:openstack%252Ftripleo-ansible+status:open+branch:stable/ussuri
https://review.opendev.org/q/project:openstack%252Ftripleo-common+status:open+branch:stable/ussuri
https://review.opendev.org/q/project:openstack%252Ftripleo-heat-templates+status:open+branch:stable/ussuri
https://review.opendev.org/q/project:openstack%252Ftripleo-image-elements+status:open+branch:stable/ussuri
https://review.opendev.org/q/project:openstack%252Ftripleo-ipsec+status:open+branch:stable/ussuri
https://review.opendev.org/q/project:openstack%252Ftripleo-puppet-elements+status:open+branch:stable/ussuri
https://review.opendev.org/q/project:openstack%252Ftripleo-validations+status:open+branch:stable/ussuri

I'll bring this up again in #tripleo next week and see if there are any objections, otherwise we can call it and start getting folks to close out those open reviews and stop posting new ones,

thanks, marios

 

On Wed, Mar 16, 2022 at 5:45 PM Marios Andreou <marios@redhat.com> wrote:

Hello TripleO o/

The tripleo-ci team proposes that we move the stable/ussuri branch for all tripleo repos [1] to End of Life [2].

The branch was moved to extended maintenance with [3] so we can already no longer make any new releases for ussuri/tripleo repos.

Are there any objections or concerns about this? If so please speak up here or directly on the patch. I think that any patches posted to ussuri nowadays are mainly about cherrypicking back to train, rather than merging something to ussuri specifically.

I have posted the proposal to move to EOL at [4] and have WF-1 to wait for this discussion.

If there are no objections then once we move to EOL the tripleo-ci team will remove all Ussuri related CI, check/gate/promotions.

regards, marios

[1] https://releases.openstack.org/teams/tripleo.html#ussuri
[2] https://docs.openstack.org/project-team-guide/stable-branches.html#maintenance-phases
[3] https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/817623
[4] https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/834049