On 10-03-20 08:25:38, Clark Boylan wrote:
On Tue, Mar 10, 2020, at 8:22 AM, Lee Yarwood wrote:
Hello all,
I've started PoC'ing some ideas around $subject in the topic below and wanted to ask the wider team for feedback on the approach I'm taking:
https://review.opendev.org/#/q/topic:nova-live-migration-zuulv3
My initial idea is to break the job up into the following smaller multinode jobs that are hopefully easier to understand and maintain.
* nova-multinode-live-migration-py3
A simple LM job using the qcow2 imagebackend and LVM/iSCSI c-vol.
* nova-multinode-live-migration-ceph-py3
A ceph based LM job using rbd for both imagebackend and c-vol.
* nova-multinode-evacuate-py3
A separate evacuation job using qcow2 imagebackend and LVM/iSCSI c-vol. The existing script *could* then be ported to an Ansible role as part of the migration to Zuulv3.
Hopefully this is pretty straight forward but I'd appreciate any feedback on this all the same.
Just a note that you can probably drop the -py3 suffix as I imagine that is assumed at this point?
Gah, of course, thanks Clark. -- Lee Yarwood A5D1 9385 88CB 7E5F BE64 6618 BCA6 6E33 F672 2D76