From my point of view I would argue that yes, however, I don't have the big picture.

Le jeu. 1 avr. 2021 à 17:42, Luigi Toscano <ltoscano@redhat.com> a écrit :
On Thursday, 1 April 2021 17:28:25 CEST Herve Beraud wrote:
> Le jeu. 1 avr. 2021 à 17:02, Ben Nemec <openstack@nemebean.com> a écrit :
> > On 4/1/21 6:24 AM, Herve Beraud wrote:
> > > Hello Osloers,
> > >
> > > Our devstack plugins (kafka and amqp1) didn't show a great amount of
> > > activity since ussuri, does it still make sense to maintain them?
> > >
> > > The latest available SHAs for the both projects comes from Victoria
> > > (merged in this period).
> > >
> > > Can we retire them or simply retire them from the coordinated releases?
> >
> > These have never been released and are no longer branched. What is their
> > involvement in the coordinated release at this point?
>
> Yes these deliverables are tagless so no released at all, however, they are
> coordinated so they are branched during each series.
>
> Though, as said Ben, those deliverables haven't been branched during the
> previous series (victoria), we suppose that they have been simply forgotten
> inadvertently,
>
> I proposed a patch to fix that point [1].

Other devstack plugins are branchless (devstack-plugin-ceph, devstack-plugin-
nfs), couldn't those be branchless too?


--
Luigi




--
Hervé Beraud
Senior Software Engineer at Red Hat
irc: hberaud
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=ECSj
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----