- все

Yes, that is absolutely true and there is no real issue with that.
I guess I was waiting with this for too long, as PrettyTable was not always the same thing as prettytable which caused us some issues from requirements/constraints prespective, which is indeed not the case nowadays.

However, as a project right now you're not allowed to define `prettytable` in requirements.txt as requirements check would just fail then. So it's more topic if we want to unify naming to what is really being installed (ie tyding up). It's not smth really functional though.

From my prespective I think that it should be allowed to use any of these names for quite some time with current state of things.

22.12.2021, 17:53, "Jeremy Stanley" <fungi@yuggoth.org>:

I'm confused. PrettyTable and prettytable are the same thing as far
as PyPI/Warehouse is concerned. Python package names are
case-insensitive, so both of these normalize to an identical string.
In fact, if you try to go to https://pypi.org/project/PrettyTable/
you will simply end up at https://pypi.org/project/prettytable/
anyway, same if you try to `pip install PrettyTable` then `pip
freeze` will tell you that you have prettytable installed.

Can you elaborate on what problem the mixed-case version of the name
is causing?
--
Jeremy Stanley

--
Kind Regards,

Dmitriy Rabotyagov