Thank you, Sean.

At 2021-06-15 18:54:00, "Sean McGinnis" <sean.mcginnis@gmx.com> wrote:
>
>This is partly due to the rollback abilities of each type of storage. Some
>types can't revert to several snapshots back without losing the more recent
>snapshots. This means that Cinder would still think there are snapshots

BTW, do we have counted which drivers can't / can revert to several snapshots
back without losing the more recent snapshots?

>available, but those snapshots would no longer be present on the storage
>device.
> >This is considered a data loss condition, so we need to protect against that >from happening. It's been discussed several times at Design Summits and PTGs, >and at least so far there has not been a good way to handle it. > >The best recommendation we can give is for anyone that needs to go back several >snapshots, you will need to revert one snapshot at a time to get back to where >you need to be. > >But it is also worth pointing out that snapshots, and the ability to revert to >snapshots, is not necessarily the best mechanism for data protection. If you >need to have the ability to restore a volume back to its earlier state, using >the backup/restore APIs are likely the more appropriate way to go. > >Sean