Hello Emilien,

Thanks for your feedback, I really appreciate it.

You are right, there are places that I really can improve, and I will work to improve it, and I really looking forward to have your help.

Regarding the amount of reviews and commits, it’s true that I haven’t be so active on tripleo upstream projects, but please, remember that stackalytics only reflect the projects under tripleo umbrella, and you know that in tripleo-ci we also work on rdo side, where I’ve been working more activelly, right now, working on integration with thirdy party projects like podman and ceph-ansible, which is not directly related to Tripleo indeed, but are key projects to Tripleo work properly.

Also, look only in the latest release patches doesn’t seems to be too fair, if you check the previous release I have more than double of reviews (although yes, the number of commits remains stable), and probably if you get the Ussuri release, I will not have too much reviews or commits, since I’ve been on vacation mostly of the december.

Also, and please, correct me if I am wrong, I don’t remember anytime that people ping me on IRC and I did not reply, or was prompt to help, if that happens, please accept my sincere apologies, as you know, when things are on fire (long time without promotions for example, like the last sprint I was ruck and rover) our focus is to make things get back to normal.

One more time, I am taking your feedback, and I’ll do my best to improve in the areas you point, and hopefully change your mind regarding my core promotion.

Kind regards,

Arx Cruz

On Fri, 10 Jan 2020 at 16:45 Emilien Macchi <emilien@redhat.com> wrote:

+1 for Chandan; no doubt; he's always available on IRC to help when things go wrong in gate or promotion, and very often he's proposing the fix.
Providing thoroughful reviews, and multi-project contributors, I've seen Chandan involved not only in TripleO CI but also in other projects like RDO and TripleO itself. I've seen him contributing to the tripleo-common and tripleoclient projects; which make him someone capable to understand not only how CI works but also how the project in general works. Having him core is to me natural.

Number of commits/reviews shows his interests in the CI repos:
https://www.stackalytics.com/?user_id=chandankumar-093047&release=train&metric=marks
https://www.stackalytics.com/?user_id=chandankumar-093047&release=train&metric=commits

----

I hate playing devil's advocate here but I'll give my honest (and hopefully constructive) opinion.
I would like to see more involvement from Arx in the TripleO community. He did a tremendous work on openstack-ansible-os_tempest; however this repo isn't governed by TripleO CI group. I would like to see more reviews; where he can bring his expertise; and not only in Gerrit but also on IRC when things aren't going well (gate issues, promotion blockers, etc).

Number of commits/reviews aren't low but IMHO can be better for a core reviewer.
https://www.stackalytics.com/?user_id=arxcruz&release=train&metric=commits
https://www.stackalytics.com/?user_id=arxcruz&release=train&metric=marks

I don't think it'll take time until Arx gets there but to me it's a -1 for now, for what it's worth.

Emilien

On Fri, Jan 10, 2020 at 9:20 AM Ronelle Landy <rlandy@redhat.com> wrote:
Hello All,

I'd like to propose Arx Cruz (arxcruz@redhat.com) and Chandan Kumar (chkumar@redhat.com) as core on tripleo-ci repos (tripleo-ci, tripleo-quickstart, tripleo-quickstart-extras).

In addition to the extensive work that Arx and Chandan have done on the Tempest-related repos ( and Tempest interface/settings within the Tripleo CI repos) , they have become active contributors to the core Tripleo CI repos, in general, in the past two years.

Please vote by replying to this thread with +1 or -1 for any objections. We will close the vote 7 days from now.

Thank you,
Ronelle

--
Emilien Macchi