Hi, We touched this topic during the PTG, but it seems that there was nobody from the participants who would like to maintain neutron-vpnaas, so I sent out a mail asking for help: http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2022-April/028123.htm...
Regards Lajos Katona (lajoskatona)
Christian Rohmann christian.rohmann@inovex.de ezt írta (időpont: 2022. ápr. 11., H, 11:00):
Hey Lajos,
On 21/03/2022 11:12, Lajos Katona wrote:
Hi Christian, Thanks for your efforts for reproduction. I will bring this topic to the team meeting tomorrow ( https://meetings.opendev.org/#Neutron_Team_Meeting ): https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Network/Meetings#On_Demand_Agenda
Regarding your frustration, I totally understand it. It is, I think can be a topic for the coming PTG.
- First thanks again for raising issue of a lack of maintainers for
VPNaaS at https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/networking/2022/networking.2022-03-22-... . Were there any more take-aways from your PTG discussion if I may ask?
Is there any chance anybody might look at our reported and DevStack-reproduced issue about the duplicate IPtable rules ( https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1943449) ? Do you need more info of any kind?
- If there is a way forward for keeping VPNaaS ...
- Will OVN receive support at some point?
https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/neutron-vpnaas/+/765353
- More protocols?
Are there any plans on extending on the types as currently only IPSEC is supported ( https://opendev.org/openstack/neutron-vpnaas/src/branch/master/neutron_vpnaa... ). I was thinking about Wireguard which is also built into the linux kernel and saw amazing pick-up in recent times. Even consumer devices use it now as it's MUCH simpler than IPSEC.
Regards
Christian