Hi Takashi,

I'd like you to wait for dropping puppet-tacker for a while.

 > - support for tacker-conductor was added 4 years after the service was
added
Unfortunately, we don't know anything about this support in current
tacker team because no one didn't join the team yet. I'd like to confirm
anyone in our users still want the module to be supported.

Thanks,
Yasufumi

On 2023/01/25 17:34, Takashi Kajinami wrote:
> Hello,
>
>
> In Puppet OpenStack projects we have multiple modules to support multiple
> OpenStack components.
> However unfortunately some of these have not been attracting enough
> interest from developers and
> have been unmaintained.
>
> During the past few cycles we retired a few incomplete modules but I'm
> wondering if we can retire
> a few unmaintained modules now, to reduce our maintenance/release effort.
>
> I checked the modules we have currently, and I think the following three
> can be first candidates.
> - puppet-murano
> - puppet-rally
> - puppet-tacker
>
> We haven't seen any feedback from users about these modules for a long
> time. Most of the changes
> for the past 2~3 years are proposed by me but I am not really using these
> components.
>
> These modules do not have proper test coverage and it's quite difficult for
> us to catch any breakage and
> honestly I'm not quite sure these modules can work properly with the latest
> code. Actually we've often
> caught up with the latest requirements several years after the change was
> made in the software side,
> and I'm afraid these are not well-maintained.
>
> eg.
>   - support for tacker-conductor was added 4 years after the service was
> added
>   - we didn't noticed that the openstack plugin was split out from the core
> rally package for several years
>
> If anybody has concerns with retiring these modules, then please let us
> know. If we don't hear any objections
> for a while, then I'll start proposing changes for project retirement.
>
> Thank you,
> Takashi