On 2020-09-16 16:51:10 +0300 (+0300), Marios Andreou wrote: [...]
I'd like to nominate myself for the PTL role - ideally working with a team of liaisons. Of course we may not find enough folks to fill all the roles documented in the spec, in which case the PTL will have to ensure this is done by some other means (in the worst case doing it themself); so let's see what the level of interest is here. Perhaps some folks will even disagree with the distributed PTL. [...]
I think there may be some misunderstanding due to how that document is laid out. It briefly describes our traditional "PTL with Liaisons" project leadership model for purposes of comparison (and to indicate that it's still the default), but then goes on to describe a new "Distributed Leadership" model which has no PTL. If you want to nominate yourself as PTL candidate for TripleO, you would do that as usual next week when PTL nominations open (see https://governance.openstack.org/election/ for instructions, but we'll also send another announcement to the ML at the start of nomination week). Whoever is elected TripleO PTL can delegate whatever duties to as many liaisons as they like, this has always been a strong recommendation anyway for a number of very good reasons. If the TripleO wants "PTL-less" distributed leadership instead (that is, a group of liaisons reporting to the team and to the TC, with no PTL as an intermediary), then that's what the 2020-08-03 Distributed Project Leadership resolution is intended to allow. -- Jeremy Stanley