Thanks, Jeremy. I have read the link you provided and would be happy to share feedback in a future *Bridging the Gap* session, if there is one. As a relatively new contributor, I believe I can share some pain points from my experience or things I wish I had known earlier. Best regards. René (Uggla) Le ven. 7 févr. 2025 à 18:53, Jeremy Stanley <fungi@yuggoth.org> a écrit :
Unfortunately, there is no magic here. Extending the review bandwidth doesn’t seem possible at the moment.
However, I see something we should focus on: If a feature misses the release freeze, it still has a "fresh" review. To avoid losing context and focus, we should aim to keep the momentum and
On 2025-02-07 18:00:35 +0100 (+0100), René Ribaud wrote: [...] try
to prioritize it so that it gets merged as early as possible in the next cycle.
We should also try to review well ahead of the release freeze to prevent last-minute changes that might cause a feature to slip again.
The key is to minimize feature rollovers from cycle to cycle as much as possible, as it can be really demotivating and lead to a loss of self-confidence. At least, that’s how it felt for me.
Of course, I understand that there are plenty of valid reasons why this happens, and unfortunately, it will happen again.
These are all great suggestions! I applaud your desire to dig into options for improving the contributor experience, and also suggest you consider getting involved in the ongoing Bridging the Gap effort. See this earlier thread for links to resources and ideas for where we could use some additional help moving things forward:
https://lists.openstack.org/archives/list/openstack-discuss@lists.openstack....
-- Jeremy Stanley