29 May
2024
29 May
'24
1:58 p.m.
Hi, Dnia środa, 29 maja 2024 10:00:16 CEST Hoai-Thu Vuong pisze: > HI Takashi, Ghanshyam and Slawek > > I have some commits to fix monasca-api to work with SQLAlchmey 2.x. But > zuul didn't run tempest test, could you help me to bring the tempest back. > > https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/monasca-api/+/919983 > Without tempest: > https://zuul.opendev.org/t/openstack/buildset/55ae32094145460fa837a795cabcee00 > (green) > With tempest: > https://zuul.opendev.org/t/openstack/buildset/d13ddf93fbbc4464a98291f9e30eb098 > (red) I just looked into this and TBH I don't know why those tempest jobs aren't triggered. They were run on PS7 and stopped on PS8. Maybe infra team will be able to help with that. > > > On Mon, Apr 29, 2024 at 12:03 PM Takashi Kajinami <kajinamit@oss.nttdata.com> > wrote: > > > Although the core monasca repos (monasca, monasca-common, monasca-agent) > > have passing CIs, > > I still see number of components monasca project have broken CI. > > python-monascaclient: > > https://review.opendev.org/q/branch:master+project:openstack/python-monascaclient > > monasca-events-api: > > https://review.opendev.org/q/branch:master+project:openstack/monasca-events-api > > > > Also some of the monasca repos have been inactive and have no patches > > merged in recent 2-3 years > > eg. monasca-log-api, monasca-analytics, ... > > > > I believe the CI in python-monascaclient needs urgent fix if we keep the > > project. I'd also > > suggest reviewing the current repositories and find anything we can retire > > early but it's > > totally up to people who will maintain the project. > > > > Finally please be aware that we are making the big reap from SQLAlchemy > > 1.x to 2.x very soon, > > and I guess you need some effort to adopt to that. So having passing CI > > now does not mean very > > much and you have to mane sure that you continue paying effort to keep CI > > gree so that > > the project is kept maintained. > > > > > > On 4/27/24 03:13, Ghanshyam Mann wrote: > > > ---- On Fri, 26 Apr 2024 10:24:38 -0700 Hoai-Thu Vuong wrote --- > > > > Hi Ghanshyam, > > > > I would like to know how to make monasca active again? Where can I > > find the status or something to help me to prioritize what I need to do?Or > > can someone guide me? > > > > > > Thanks for the response and working towards making it active. > > > > > > Please check the requirements for making it active again: > > > - > > https://governance.openstack.org/tc/reference/emerging-technology-and-inactive-projects.html#exit-criteria > > > > > > I checked the gate status for a few of the repos and it seems green. > > > > > > * How to propose to make it active: > > > - Propose a governance change to remove Monasca from the Inactive list[1] > > > > > > [1] > > https://github.com/openstack/governance/blob/cbf0607bdce40d40105e7e2ea99b74af33383cb2/reference/emerging-technology-and-inactive-projects.rst#current-inactive-projects > > > > > > Let me know if there are any more queries on the process. > > > > > > -gmann > > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Apr 25, 2024 at 3:55 AM Ghanshyam Mann > > gmann@ghanshyammann.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > Thu.Hi All, > > > > > > > > Ignore the retirement notification for Monasca which I sent by > > mistake. > > > > > > > > Monasca project is still in 'inactive'[1] state but we have PTL for > > this project > > > > on this cycle. I would like to call the project maintainer/PTL to > > check the project > > > > activities and criteria to move its status to 'Active'[2]. > > > > > > > > The deadline to make it active is milestone 2 of this cycle (Jul 01 > > - Jul 05: R-13) > > > > and after that TC will discuss about next step which can be > > retirement. > > > > > > > > [1] > > https://governance.openstack.org/tc/reference/emerging-technology-and-inactive-projects.html#current-inactive-projects > > > > [2] > > https://governance.openstack.org/tc/reference/emerging-technology-and-inactive-projects.html#exit-criteria > > > > > > > > -gmann > > > > > > > > ---- On Wed, 24 Apr 2024 13:39:55 -0700 Ghanshyam Mann wrote --- > > > > > Hello everyone, > > > > > > > > > > As you might know, the Monasca project is not active and was > > marked 'inactive' > > > > > since 2024.1 cycle[1]. In this cycle also, this project is > > leaderless[2] and no maintainer > > > > > stepped up to maintain it. As discussed in the Leaderless project > > etherpad[2], the next > > > > > step is to retire the project. > > > > > > > > > > I'm sending this email to propose the Monasca retirement and > > based on the response, > > > > > I will proceed next. > > > > > > > > > > [1] > > https://governance.openstack.org/tc/reference/emerging-technology-and-inactive-projects.html#current-inactive-projects > > > > > [2] https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/2024.2-leaderless#L72 > > > > > > > > > > -gmann > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > Thu. > -- Slawek Kaplonski Principal Software Engineer Red Hat