On 2020-05-08 22:06:14 +0200 (+0200), Thomas Goirand wrote:
On 5/8/20 7:58 PM, Jeremy Stanley wrote: [...]
whether the Puppet OpenStack team wants the burden of spending a cycle targeting support for a Puppet version which will be EOL the month after the release (especially given deployment projects usually release as much as a month after the coordinated release already).
I don't see how this can be a burden. It's not as if the language changed that much and if there was major incompatibilities. [...]
Well, it does mean keeping those modules working with two major versions of Puppet which, speaking from past experience, is not easy (and a big part of why we decided to replace all our orchestration and configuration management in OpenDev with something other than Puppet after the Puppet 3->4->5 transition). How much of a strain that is on the Puppet OpenStack team, I can't say. -- Jeremy Stanley