Hi Tobias, Good to see RMQ alternatives appearing. A couple of questions from me. On Mon, 29 Aug 2022 at 15:47, Tobias Urdin <tobias.urdin@binero.com> wrote:
• Do retries and acknowledgements in the library (since NATS does NOT persist messages like RabbitMQ could)
What do you mean? Is NATS only a router? (I have not used this technology yet.)
• Find or maintain a NATS python library that doesn't use async like the official one does
Why is async a bad thing? For messaging it's the right thing. Finally, have you considered just trying out ZeroMQ? I mean, NATS is probably an overkill for OpenStack services since the majority of them stay static on the hosts they control (think nova-compute, neutron agents - and these are also the pain points that operators want to ease). NATS seems to me to cater for a different use case. I might be wrong because I have read only the front page but that is the feeling I have. Cheers, Radek -yoctozepto