Hi Herve,

Please correct me, does that mean we have to also EOL stable/queens and stable/rocky for most of the other projects technically? Or it should be OK? Thanks.

On 5/10/21 5:09 am, Herve Beraud wrote:

On our last meeting of the oslo team we discussed the problem with broken stable
branches (rocky and older) in oslo's projects [1].

Indeed, almost all these branches are broken. Előd Illés kindly generated a list of periodic-stable errors on Oslo's stable branches [2].

Given the lack of active maintainers on Oslo and given the current status of the CI in those branches, I propose to make them End Of Life.

I will wait until the end of month for anyone who would like to maybe step up
as maintainer of those branches and who would at least try to fix CI of them.

If no one will volunteer for that, I'll EOLing those branches for all the projects under the oslo umbrella.

Let us know your thoughts.

Thank you for your attention.

[1] https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/oslo/2021/oslo.2021-10-04-15.00.log.txt
[2] http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2021-July/023939.html

Hervé Beraud
Senior Software Engineer at Red Hat
irc: hberaud
Cheers & Best regards,
Feilong Wang (王飞龙) (he/him)
Head of Research & Development

Catalyst Cloud
Aotearoa's own

Mob: +64 21 0832 6348 | www.catalystcloud.nz
Level 6, 150 Willis Street, Wellington 6011, New Zealand

CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This email is intended for the named recipients only.
It may contain privileged, confidential or copyright information. If you are 
not the named recipient, any use, reliance upon, disclosure or copying of this 
email or its attachments is unauthorised. If you have received this email in 
error, please reply via email or call +64 21 0832 6348.