W dniu 16.09.2019 o 18:45, Michael Turek pisze:
Hey all,
We do use kolla. Let me see if I can shed some light here.
I have to admit that I wanted to check is there anyone using Kolla on ppc64le. Thanks for replies.
CentOS builds lack 'rabbitmq' 3.7.10 (we use external repo) and 'gnocchi' binary images are not buildable due to lack of some packages (issue already reported to CentOS by TripleO team).
We should be getting the gnocchi issue fixed. See this thread https://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-devel/2019-September/017721.html
I am in that thread ;)
The rabbitmq issue is confusing me. The version provided for x86_64 seems to be the same one provided for ppc64le, but maybe I'm missing something. If there's a package we need to get published, I can investigate.
External repo is used and we install "rabbitmq-3.7.10". One 'if ppc64le' check and will work by using in-centos-repo version.
Ubuntu builds lack MariaDB 10.3 because upstream repo is broken. Packages index is provided for 'ppc64le' but no packages so we get 404 errors.
Unfortunately I'm not well versed on the gaps in Ubuntu.
I am fine with it. No one noticed == no one uses.
The question I have is, what do you need to maintain support? I can join this week's IRC meeting if that would be helpful.
For me a knowledge that someone is using is enough to keep it available. Would not call it 'maintaining support' as I do builds on ppc64le once per cycle (if at all per cycle).
Also, last week mnasiadka reached out to me asking if we might be able to turn on kolla jobs in pkvmci (our third party CI - https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/ThirdPartySystems/IBMPowerKVMCI ). I plan to talk to our CI folks this week to see if we have capacity for this.
Some kind of CI job would be great. Even simple 'centos/source' combo.
I have two patches adding AArch64 CI but we (Linaro) have to fix our OpenStack cluster first. All Ceph nodes use hard drives only and probably not configured optimally. As a result we are unable to fit in three hours required by Zuul.