At today's Ironic meeting, many cores were around to discuss a potential move to the DPL model. This allows the project to continue our practice of distributed leadership without having to have a song and dance every six months about who will bear the PTL title :). https://governance.openstack.org/tc/reference/distributed-project-leadership... documents required and optional roles for DPL model. These are listed below for clarity: (required) - Release liason - tact-sig liason (CI) - Security liason - TC liason (optional) - Events liason - Project Update/Onboarding liason - Meeting Facilitator - Bug Deputy - RFE Coordinator I'd suggest that for Ironic purposes, we obviously need someone in each of the required roles; but I'd strongly suggest we also assign an events liason so we have a single point of responsibility for PTG signup and planning. Along these lines, if we'd like Ironic to go to DPL, I will volunteer to be the Security liason. One concern raised in the Ironic meeting is that the DPL is traditionally associated with low-activity projects; Ironic is an extremely active project with multiple senior developers working on it -- our move to DPL is simply meant to model our actual working mode with everyone pitching in as needed. What do folks think? If you are in favor of a move to DPL, I'd suggest volunteering for a liason role. Thanks, Jay Faulkner On 2/6/25 7:27 AM, Riccardo Pittau wrote:
Hello ironicers!
It's been a pleasure and an honor to serve as PTL for 2 cycles. I've decided to not be a candidate for the next cycle, mainly because of time constraints. Huge thanks to the community for having me, I hope in the future I'll be able to repeat the experience.
Ciao! Riccardo
#irc rpittau