Hi, Basically I am fine with it, I will bring this topic to the meeting today. Lajos Mohammed Naser <mnaser@vexxhost.com> ezt írta (időpont: 2022. máj. 23., H, 23:49):
Hiya,
As part of cleaning up VPNaaS, I decided to explore fixing the longstanding failures of the `neutron-tempest-plugin-vpnaas-libreswan-centos` job that was always failing and non-voting.
Upon trying to flip the switch on it in a test change[1], I noticed that much of the test results seem to be simply exercising the API[2], essentially making the fact that we run that job on CentOS a bit redundant.
The tests that actually exercise more than the API and validate connectivity are the functional tests, which currently run for "StrongSwan" only on Ubuntu. My question to the Neutron team is:
1. Should we get rid of the functional jobs and move them into neutron-tempest-plugin, and run that for different platforms? 2. Should we get rid of the neutron-tempest-plugin job under CentOS and add functional jobs for CentOS?
My inclination seems to be #2, since that is what other stadium projects seem to be doing (no one seems to run platform-specific neutron-tempest-plugin jobs). It also keeps maintainability simpler since it remains in the hands of the VPNaaS team.
Thanks Mohammed
[1]: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/neutron-vpnaas/+/843005 [2]: https://storage.bhs.cloud.ovh.net/v1/AUTH_dcaab5e32b234d56b626f72581e3644c/z...
-- Mohammed Naser VEXXHOST, Inc.