Where can I find the video of that presentation?

On Thursday, February 9, 2023, 06:28:42 AM EST, Eoghan Glynn <eglynn@redhat.com> wrote:

On Thu, Feb 9, 2023 at 6:18 AM Ümit Seren <uemit.seren@gmail.com> wrote:

What are the implications with regards to RDO and RHOSP which are based on TripleO ?
Will they move to a different deployment method or will also development seize after Zed ?

Yes, the team at Red Hat is working on a different deployment method for our product, specifically by hosting the control plane natively on OpenShift while managing the dataplane with pure Ansible. We talked about this strategy a bit at the Open Infra Summit in Berlin last June.

(Since you asked, I'm answering ... but I don't want to derail what should be a community-oriented discussion about TripleO by conflating it with our future product plans)

Thanks,

Eoghan

 

 
Best

Ümit Seren

 

From:James Slagle <james.slagle@gmail.com>
Date: Wednesday, 8. February 2023 at 18:38
To: OpenStack Discuss <openstack-discuss@lists.openstack.org>
Subject: [TripleO] Last maintained release of TripleO is Wallaby

The team of TripleO developers, reviewers, and community have no plans to do another release of TripleO, or to continue maintaining the Zed release. This means the last maintained release of TripleO is Wallaby. The plan is to continue to maintain the train and wallaby branches of TripleO repositories under the openstack namespace. We plan to continue to run existing CI on those branches, although we anticipate reducing to a minimal set of jobs in the future. Going forward, the TripleO team expects to continue involvement in other OpenStack projects, and focus on different approaches to OpenStack deployment.

 

The team is not aware of enough other community interest to continue to maintain the zed, master, and future branches of TripleO. Eventually, we will empty commit these branches with a pointer to Wallaby being the last release. If other interests do exist to maintain TripleO going forward, then those plans can adjust.

 

TripleO does not plan on nominating a PTL in the current Bobcat election cycle. If a PTL-like contact is needed for train and wallaby maintenance, then someone will be nominated. I am also not sure how to reflect this project structure change within openstack/governance, and am looking for guidance on how to do so. This type of change did not seem to exactly fit within the concepts of inactive or retired projects. I can work on the patches for governance with some direction, if anyone can provide it. Thanks, and please let us know any questions or feedback about this plan.

--

-- James Slagle
--