On Wed, Apr 15, 2020 at 9:30 PM Wesley Hayutin <whayutin@redhat.com> wrote:
Looking to see if there are strong preferences for our time slots for the PTG. I would suggest we try to shoot for 13-17 UTC slot [1] as much as possible. Any strong preference in not utilizing that time slot
One suggestion. I think we could have 2 kinds of time slots. One that is APAC / EMEA friendly and another which is NA / EMEA friendly. If we do well with Etherpad / IRC / emails, we can certainly deal with missing folks in some sessions and eventually do smaller sessions but more distributed time-wise. Example given: "Session about improving Upgrade CLI" - a first session on EMEA morning / APAC afternoon; notes taken in etherpad, sent to ML - a second session on EMEA afternoon / NA morning; notes taken in etherpad, summary of both sessions sent to ML; if consensus isn't reached; use ML or schedule a third session out of band eventually. I would like to see this exercise as an opportunity to learn how we can make decisions in async; involving everyone interested in a topic, no matter the location/timezone. So what I propose is that each session leader makes sure that the sessions can cover an overlapped time (hard to define though) or think about the "multiple smaller sessions" idea. What do you think? -- Emilien Macchi