Hi,
On 10/29/19 9:52 AM, Michał Dulko wrote:
Hi,
It's been more than a year after fuxi [1] and fuxi-kubernetes [2] were declared as retired. First one was supposed to integrate Docker with Cinder and Manila. The second was aiming to do the same with Kubernetes.
I'm not really sure how to serve the first use case, but it seems like there are some alternatives [3], [4]. fuxi-kubernetes use case is now served by Cloud Provider OpenStack in Cinder [5] and Manila [6] CSI plugins, which seem like a much better fit.
Currently the only maintained deliverables in kuryr project are kuryr, kuryr-libnetwork and kuryr-kubernetes. All of them are related to networking. Given that I'd like to propose rephrasing Kuryr mission statement from:
Bridge between container framework networking and storage models to OpenStack networking and storage abstractions.
to
Bridge between container framework networking models to OpenStack networking abstractions.
effectively getting storage out of project scope.
Do totally agree, both fuxi and fuxi-kubernetes are now completely deprecated and overridden by another projects, so tbh it doesn't make sense to keep the 'storage' label around any longer.
Are there any thoughts or objections? Maybe someone sees a better phrasing?
Let's just drop the storage part for now
Thanks, Michał
Best!
Daniel
[1] https://opendev.org/openstack/fuxi [2] https://opendev.org/openstack/fuxi-kubernetes [3] https://rexray.readthedocs.io/en/stable/user-guide/schedulers/docker/plug-in... [4] https://github.com/j-griffith/cinder-docker-driver [5] https://github.com/kubernetes/cloud-provider-openstack/blob/master/docs/usin... [6] https://github.com/kubernetes/cloud-provider-openstack/blob/master/docs/usin...