As we're reaching the Stein-3 milestone [5] and preparing for the Denver summit. We, as a team, would like have a formal project health evaluation in several aspects such as active contributors / team, planning, bug fixes, features, etc. We would love to have some voice from the TC team and anyone from the community who follows our effort during the Stein cycle. We then would want to update the information at [6] and [7] to avoid any confusion that may stop potential contributors or users to come to Searchlight.
[1] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/588644/ [2] https://www.dangtrinh.com/2018/10/searchlight-at-stein-1-weekly-report.html [3] https://www.dangtrinh.com/2019/01/searchlight-at-stein-2-r-14-r-13.html [4] https://docs.openstack.org/searchlight/latest/user/usecases.html#our-vision [5] https://releases.openstack.org/stein/schedule.html [6] https://governance.openstack.org/election/results/stein/ptl.html [7] https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/OpenStack_health_tracker
It really looks like great progress with Searchlight over this release. Nice work Trinh and all that have been involved in that.
[6] is a historical record of what happened with the PTL election. What would you want to update there? The best path forward, in my opinion, is to make sure there is a clear PTL candidate for the Train release.
[7] is a periodic update of notes between TC members and the projects. If you would like to get more information added there, I would recommend working with the two TC members assigned to Searchlight to get an update. That appears to be Chris Dent and Dims.
Sean