On Thu, Nov 12, 2020 at 11:25:09AM +0100, Matthias Runge wrote:
Hi there,
one of the biggest challenges for the telemetry stack is currently the state of gnocchi, which is... undefined/unfortunate/under-contributed/...?
Hi there, we had our planning/brainstorming, where we talked about the current state and the situation with gnocchi specifically. The situation can probably be described as: gnocchi fills a gap we couldn't satisfy to 100% if we would have to replace it. Also it is seen as well performing and functional. We also talked about the discussion around moving gnocchi back under openinfra and what this would solve. It is well understood, that the initial gnocchi project contributors are not paid for any work they do on gnocchi. We agreed to address the concern "we can not merge anything in gnocchi" by contributing to gnocchi for the next cycle and to revisit the situation next cycle. Julien, Mehdi and also Gord mentioned(iirc), that a bar for getting merge permission for a project with only a few contributors is quite low. A few PRs against gnocchi were mentioned, which were contributed but not reviewed/merged yet. * https://github.com/gnocchixyz/gnocchi/pull/1059 * https://github.com/gnocchixyz/gnocchi/pull/1062 * https://github.com/gnocchixyz/gnocchi/pull/1056 (this one was merged) * https://github.com/gnocchixyz/python-gnocchiclient/pull/104 We'll take a look and see how to proceed here. Gnocchis CI system apparently needs some work. On a related note, we are actively seeking to increase the collaboration with related projects or sigs, for example with CloudKitty. [1] https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/telemetry-wallaby-topics Matthias -- Matthias Runge <mrunge@matthias-runge.de>