18 Oct
2019
18 Oct
'19
3:44 a.m.
On 19-10-17 14:42:58, Matt Riedemann wrote:
On 10/17/2019 1:00 PM, Matt Riedemann wrote:
This would have been useful information before actually merging the change to drop this code. We have at least a few postgres jobs (the grenade one is relatively new) because we have postgres support in a few places, like placement.
What maintenance burden did people actually have when the pg jobs didn't break?
I've proposed a revert:
Thanks, some of us are still using postgres (think it was installed grizzly / folsom time frame). I understand the desire for removal but doesn't make me any less sad. -- Matthew Thode