I think you want to take a look at
https://insights.linuxfoundation.org/project/OpenStack instead. An
email was sent to the list some time ago about this [0].
[0]: https://lists.openstack.org/archives/list/openstack-discuss@lists.openstack.org/message/L63X443VSEOSTOQNG57GEDYSF3BX744L/
On Wed, May 6, 2026 at 8:36 AM Amit Uniyal <auniyal@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> > https://openstack.biterg.io/app/dashboards#/view/Overview
>
> Is this down or decommissioned ?
>
> On Thu, Jun 6, 2024 at 7:15 PM <smooney@redhat.com> wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, 2024-06-06 at 09:11 -0400, Ihar Hrachyshka wrote:
>> > On Thu, Jun 6, 2024 at 6:46 AM <smooney@redhat.com> wrote:
>> >
>> > > On Wed, 2024-06-05 at 20:48 -0400, Ihar Hrachyshka wrote:
>> > > > Thank you Julia, this is very helpful, I wasn't aware. This covers both
>> > > > commits (Git -> Overview) and reviews (Gerrit -> Approvals), it seems.
>> > > And
>> > > > I am able to add a "project is neutron" filter that aggregates from all
>> > > > project repos too.
>> > > its missing a breakdown fo how many reviews people are doing
>> > > the breakdown of +1 -1 +2 -2 and +w and the + to - ratio
>> > >
>> > > when i filetered on nova on the gerrtit tab i didnt see any obvious way to
>> > > determin that.
>> > >
>> > >
>> > When I select Gerrit -> Approvals and then filter by project = neutron, I
>> > see +1, -1, +2, -2 listed separately (see screenshot, hopefully it gets
>> > through), but yes - no +Ws and no calculation of the ratio (which I'd
>> > assume should be relatively easy to calculate.)
>> >
>> > [image: image.png]
>> ah its under approves not overview
>> ok that is reasonably workable.
>>
>> i thin the "approvals" column is actiolly the total number of reviews so that column
>> name should proably be updated.
>>
>> the main use i have of the raitio os to see as a glance which reviews exclivily or almost
>> exlcitlivye leave only +1 reviews.
>> you can infer that form other metirics too.
>>
>> neither all +1 or all -1 are good and a biais in either direction is fine but
>> if we see a lot fo reivew form one perosn or one company that are all +1 espiecally if they dont
>> have any inline comments in the review that a redflag that they are effectively stats gaming.
>> and that there review may not be an indicator of quaility with regards to the relevent patch.
>>
>> you can create some interestign views with the dashboard like
>> https://openstack.biterg.io/app/dashboards?security_tenant=openstack#/view/95487340-6762-11e9-a198-67126215b112?_g=(filters:!(),refreshInterval:(pause:!t,value:0),time:(from:now-90d,to:now))&_a=(description:'Gerrit%20Approvals%20panel%20by%20Bitergia',filters:!(('$state':(store:appState),meta:(alias:Bots,disabled:!f,index:gerrit,key:author_bot,negate:!t,params:(query:!t),type:phrase),query:(match:(author_bot:(query:!t,type:phrase)))),('$state':(store:appState),meta:(alias:!n,disabled:!f,index:gerrit,key:project,negate:!f,params:(query:nova),type:phrase),query:(match_phrase:(project:nova))),('$state':(store:appState),meta:(alias:!n,disabled:!f,index:gerrit,key:branch,negate:!t,params:(query:master),type:phrase),query:(match_phrase:(branch:master)))),fullScreenMode:!f,options:(darkTheme:!f,hidePanelTitles:!f,useMargins:!t),query:(language:lucene,query:''),timeRestore:!f,title:'Gerrit%20Approvals',viewMode:view)
>>
>> i.e. the peopel who have reviewed changes to nova stable (non master) branches in the last 90 days.
>>
>> >
>> >
>> > > >
>> > > > Ihar
>> > > >
>> > > > On Wed, Jun 5, 2024 at 1:28 PM Julia Kreger <juliaashleykreger@gmail.com
>> > > >
>> > > > wrote:
>> > > >
>> > > > > Just as a note, I know stackalytics has had issues over the years, in
>> > > part
>> > > > > as an unofficial tool, such that an entirely different dashboard has
>> > > been
>> > > > > posted[0] with the help of the Foundation. At a glance, it doesn't
>> > > appear
>> > > > > to provide review level statistics, but there are also some separate
>> > > tools
>> > > > > to generate that data if needed.
>> > > > >
>> > > > > -Julia
>> > > > >
>> > > > > [0]: https://openstack.biterg.io/app/dashboards#/view/Overview
>> > > > >
>> > > > > On Wed, Jun 5, 2024 at 7:43 AM Ihar Hrachyshka <ihrachys@redhat.com>
>> > > > > wrote:
>> > > > >
>> > > > > > Hi,
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > I noticed that "neutron" is not an option in the Module list when
>> > > Commits
>> > > > > > are selected, and no neutron commits are registered since ~Oct 2023.
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > On the other hand, other Neutron program repos (e.g. neutron-lib and
>> > > > > > neutron-tempest-plugin) are available in the list and do register
>> > > commits.
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > Also, when Reviews are selected, neutron module is back as an
>> > > option, and
>> > > > > > review stats are correctly updated.
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > I checked governance yaml and it doesn't strike me as incorrect:
>> > > > > >
>> > > https://opendev.org/openstack/governance/src/commit/5f93b99a3c90b452f6c73686dbcc3a6bbcd6eee8/reference/projects.yaml#L882
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > Any ideas what may have happened?
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > Thanks,
>> > > > > > Ihar
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > >
>> > >
>> > >
>>