30 Apr
2019
30 Apr
'19
2:35 a.m.
Why would it require GROUP_A to provide resources? Haven't we already established that we're going to need to lighten the requirement that 'requiredN' must have a 'resourcesN'? If we haven't, perhaps this is the thing that will push us that way?
Oic, so group A could be a (potentially resourceless) provider with a trait like NUMA_NODE or SRIOV_NET_AGENT. If we can get by the other issue - to which I shall henceforth refer as "inter-group referencing" - I could get behind this. Did we decide on "traits (and/or aggregates) flow down" too? I'm losing track of how all these things interact and which combinations are necessary to solve which use cases. efried .