Hi,

Putting the quoting in order, and stopping the top-post... :)

My follow-up below...

> On Jun 20, 2024 9:55 PM, Rafael Weingärtner
> <rafaelweingartner@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>     Hello OpenStack community and users of CloudKitty!
>
>     There have been some discussions in our bi-weekly meetings and vPTG
>     meetings regarding the deprecation and removal of ElasticSearch
>     support as a storage backend.  Therefore, this e-mail is to
>     consult/query users regarding ElasticSearch users. If there are no
>     people using it anymore with CloudKitty, we are considering the
>     alternative of removing it and maintaining only the OpenSearch support.
>
>     We would like to hear back from you guys. Let me know if you are
>     using ElasticSearch, and if you intend to stick with it. Also, do
>     you guys feel the need to improve something in its support in
>     CloudKitty.
>
>
>
>     Thanks in advance for your feedback!
>
>     --
>
>     Rafael Weingärtner
>
 > *From: *thomas@goirand.fr <thomas@goirand.fr>
 > *Date: *Friday, 21 June 2024 at 8:05 am
 > *To: *Rafael Weingärtner <rafaelweingartner@gmail.com>,
 > openstack-discuss <openstack-discuss@lists.openstack.org>
 > *Subject: *Re: [CloudKitty] query regarding ElasticSearch usage
 >
 > Hi,
 >
 > We are using ES, and as much as I know, the team maintaining the cluster
 > has no intention switching to something else.
 >
 > Please, keep the driver alive.
 >
 > Cheers,
 >
 > Thomas Goirand
On 6/21/24 00:22, Karl Kloppenborg wrote:
 > Hey team,
 >
 > Isn’t it correct that OpenSearch and ES drivers should be generically
 > compatible with each other?
 >
 > --Karl.

Like Karl, I'm kind of surprised, because both drivers must be very
close. Instead of removing the ES driver, can't we have both drivers
actually merged into a single one, that may take into accounts the very
small differences (if any) between the 2 types of clusters? Code
factorization is always good...

Cheers,

Thomas Goirand (zigo)