Hi,
my openstack being operational and must absolutely be ok for several months (student projects), I don't touch it...
In France we have the saying "Scalded cat fears cold water »
I understand :-)
But I put all this information aside. I will have to look at this more closely, and especially that I change storage by switching to ceph.
Although Ceph might be challenging at the beginning I'm a big fan of it and can only encourage you to do that.
Zitat von Franck VEDEL franck.vedel@univ-grenoble-alpes.fr:
Thank you for your help.
my openstack being operational and must absolutely be ok for several months (student projects), I don't touch it...
In France we have the saying "Scalded cat fears cold water »
But I put all this information aside. I will have to look at this more closely, and especially that I change storage by switching to ceph. Thanks again Eugen
Franck
Le 9 févr. 2022 à 09:12, Eugen Block eblock@nde.ag a écrit :
I haven't used iscsi as a backend yet, but for HDDs the speed looks relatable, on a system with HDD ceph backend the volume creation of a volume (image is 2 GB) takes about 40 seconds, as you yee the download is quite slow, the conversion is a little faster:
Image download 541.00 MB at 28.14 MB/s Converted 2252.00 MB image at 172.08 MB/s
With a factor of 10 (20 GB) I would probably end up with similar creation times. Just for comparison, this is almost the same image (also 2 GB) in a different ceph cluster where I mounted the cinder conversion path from cephfs, SSD pool:
Image download 555.12 MB at 41.34 MB/s Converted 2252.00 MB image at 769.17 MB/s
This volume was created within 20 seconds. You might also want to tweak these options:
block_device_allocate_retries = 300 block_device_allocate_retries_interval = 10
These are the defaults:
block_device_allocate_retries = 60 block_device_allocate_retries_interval = 3
This would fit your error message:
Volume be0f28eb-1045-4687-8bdb-5a6d385be6fa did not finish being created even after we waited 187 seconds or 61 attempts. And its status is downloading.
It tried 60 times with a 3 second interval, apparently that's not enough. Can you see any bottlenecks in the network or disk utilization which would slow down the download?
Zitat von Franck VEDEL franck.vedel@univ-grenoble-alpes.fr:
Hi Eugen, thanks for your help We have 3 servers (s1, s2 , s3) and an iscsi bay attached on s3. Multinode: [control] s1 s2
[compute] s1 s2 s3
[storage] s3
on s1: more /etc/kolla/globals.yml ... enable_cinder: "yes" enable_cinder_backend_iscsi: "yes" enable_cinder_backend_lvm: « yes" enable_iscsid: « yes" cinder_volume_group: "cinder-volumes » ... enable_glance_image_cache: "yes" glance_cache_max_size: "21474836480" glance_file_datadir_volume: « /images/« ...
on s3: /images is on the iscsi bay mount |grep images /dev/mapper/VG--IMAGES-LV--IMAGES on /images type xfs (rw,relatime,seclabel,attr2,inode64,logbufs=8,logbsize=32k,sunit=1024,swidth=1024,noquota)
lsblk sdf 8:80 0 500G 0 disk └─mpathc 253:3 0 500G 0 mpath └─mpathc1 253:4 0 500G 0 part └─VG--IMAGES-LV--IMAGES 253:5 0 500G 0 lvm /images
ls -l /images: drwxr-x---. 5 42415 42415 4096 6 févr. 18:40 image-cache drwxr-x---. 2 42415 42415 4096 4 févr. 15:16 images drwxr-x---. 2 42415 42415 6 22 nov. 12:03 staging drwxr-x---. 2 42415 42415 6 22 nov. 12:03 tasks_work_dir
ls -l /images/image-cache total 71646760 -rw-r-----. 1 42415 42415 360841216 2 déc. 11:52 3e3aada8-7610-4c55-b116-a12db68f8ea4 -rw-r-----. 1 42415 42415 237436928 28 nov. 16:56 6419642b-fcbd-4e5d-9c77-46a48d2af93f -rw-r-----. 1 42415 42415 10975379456 26 nov. 14:59 7490e914-8001-4d56-baea-fabf80f425e1 -rw-r-----. 1 42415 42415 21474836480 22 nov. 16:46 7fc7f9a6-ab0e-45cf-9c29-7e59f6aa68a5 -rw-r-----. 1 42415 42415 2694512640 15 déc. 18:07 890fd2e8-2fac-42c6-956b-6b10f2253a56 -rw-r-----. 1 42415 42415 12048400384 1 déc. 17:04 9a235763-ff0c-40fd-9a8d-7cdca3d3e9ce -rw-r-----. 1 42415 42415 5949227008 15 déc. 20:41 9cbba37b-1de1-482a-87f2-631d2143cd46 -rw-r-----. 1 42415 42415 566994944 6 déc. 12:32 b6e29dd9-a66d-4569-a222-6fc0bd9b1b11 -rw-r-----. 1 42415 42415 578748416 2 déc. 11:24 c40953ee-4b39-43a5-8f6c-b48a046c38e9 -rw-r-----. 1 42415 42415 16300544 27 janv. 12:19 c88630c7-a7c6-44ff-bfa0-e5af4b1720e3 -rw-r-----. 1 42415 42415 12288 6 févr. 18:40 cache.db -rw-r-----. 1 42415 42415 12324503552 1 déc. 07:50 e0d4fddd-5aa7-4177-a1d6-e6b4c56f12e8 -rw-r-----. 1 42415 42415 6139084800 22 nov. 15:05 eda93204-9846-4216-a6e8-c29977fdcf2f -rw-r-----. 1 42415 42415 0 22 nov. 12:03 image_cache_db_init drwxr-x---. 2 42415 42415 6 27 janv. 12:19 incomplete drwxr-x---. 2 42415 42415 6 22 nov. 12:03 invalid drwxr-x---. 2 42415 42415 6 22 nov. 12:03 queue
on s1 openstack image list +--------------------------------------+-----------------------------+--------+ | ID | Name | Status | +--------------------------------------+-----------------------------+--------+ ….. | 7fc7f9a6-ab0e-45cf-9c29-7e59f6aa68a5 | rocky8.4 | active | …. | 7490e914-8001-4d56-baea-fabf80f425e1 | win10_2104 | active | …. +———————————————————+-----------------------------+————+
openstack image show 7fc7f9a6-ab0e-45cf-9c29-7e59f6aa68a5 disk_format | raw
when I try to add an instance from this image (2G RAM, 40G HDD): [Error : Build of instance baa06bef-9628-407f-8bae-500ef7bce065 aborted: Volume be0f28eb-1045-4687-8bdb-5a6d385be6fa did not finish being created even after we waited 187 seconds or 61 attempts. And its status is downloading.
it’s impossible. I need to add the volume from image first, and after add instance from volume.
Is it normal ?
Franck
Le 7 févr. 2022 à 10:55, Eugen Block eblock@nde.ag a écrit :
Hi Franck,
although it's a different topic than your original question I wanted to comment on the volume creation time (maybe a new thread would make sense). What is your storage back end? If it is ceph, are your images in raw format? Otherwise cinder has to download the image from glance (to /var/lib/cinder/conversion) and convert it, then upload it back to ceph. It's similar with nova, nova stores base images in /var/lib/nova/instances/_base to prevent the compute nodes from downloading it every time. This may save some time for the download, but the upload has to happen anyway. And if you don't use shared storage for nova (e.g. for live-migration) you may encounter that some compute nodes are quicker creating an instance because they only have to upload, others will first have to download, convert and then upload it.
You would see the conversion in the logs of cinder:
INFO cinder.image.image_utils [req-f2062570-4006-464b-a1f5-d0d5ac34670d d71f59600f1c40c394022738d4864915 31b9b4900a4d4bdaabaf263d0b4021be
- -] Converted 2252.00 MB image at 757.52 MB/s
Hope this helps.
Eugen
Zitat von Franck VEDEL franck.vedel@univ-grenoble-alpes.fr:
Sunday morning: my openstack works…. OUF. the "kolla-ansible -i multimode mariadb_recovery" command (which is magic anyway) fixed the problem and then the mariadb and nova containers started. Once solved the problems between my serv3 and the iscsi bay, restart the container glance, everything seems to work.
4 minutes to create a 20GB empty volume seems too long to me. For an actual 20GB image, it's going to depend on the speed of the backing storage tech.
4 minutes is for a volume from an image. I will see this problem next summer , I will retry to change the MTU value.
Thanks a lot, really
Franck
Le 5 févr. 2022 à 17:08, Laurent Dumont laurentfdumont@gmail.com a écrit :
Any chance to revert back switches + server? That would indicate that MTU was the issue. Dont ping the iscsi bay, ping between the controllers in Openstack, they are the ones running mariadb/galera. Since the icmp packets are small, it might not trigger the MTU issues. Can you try something like "ping -s 8972 -M do -c 4 $mariadb_host_2" from $ mariadb_host_1? What is your network setup on the servers? Two ports in a bond? Did you change both physical interface MTU + bond interface itself?
4 minutes to create a 20GB empty volume seems too long to me. For an actual 20GB image, it's going to depend on the speed of the backing storage tech.
On Sat, Feb 5, 2022 at 1:51 AM Franck VEDEL <franck.vedel@univ-grenoble-alpes.fr mailto:franck.vedel@univ-grenoble-alpes.fr> wrote: Thanks for your help.
> What was the starting value for MTU? 1500 > What was the starting value changed to for MTU? 9000 > Can ping between all your controllers? yes, all container starts except nova-conductor, nova-scheduler, maraidb
> Do you just have two controllers running mariadb? yes > How did you change MTU?
On the 3 servers: nmcli connection modify team0-port1 802-3-ethernet.mtu 9000 nmcli connection modify team1-port2 802-3-ethernet.mtu 9000 nmcli connection modify type team0 team.runner lack ethernet.mtu 9000 nmcli con down team0 nmcli con down team1
> Was the change reverted at the network level as well (switches > need to be configured higher or at the same MTU value then the > servers) I didn’t change Mtu on network (switches) , but ping -s 10.0.5.117 (iscsi bay) was working from serv3.
I changed the value of the mtu because the creation of the volumes takes a lot of time I find (4 minutes for 20G, which is too long for what I want to do, the patience of the students decreases with the years)
Franck
> Le 4 févr. 2022 à 23:12, Laurent Dumont > <laurentfdumont@gmail.com mailto:laurentfdumont@gmail.com> a > écrit : > > What was the starting value for MTU? > What was the starting value changed to for MTU? > Can ping between all your controllers? > Do you just have two controllers running mariadb? > How did you change MTU? > Was the change reverted at the network level as well (switches > need to be configured higher or at the same MTU value then the > servers) > 4567 seems to be the port for galera (clustering for mariadb) <> > On Fri, Feb 4, 2022 at 11:52 AM Franck VEDEL > <franck.vedel@univ-grenoble-alpes.fr > mailto:franck.vedel@univ-grenoble-alpes.fr> wrote: > Hello, > I am in an emergency situation, quite catastrophic situation > because I do not know what to do. > > I have an Openstack cluster with 3 servers (serv1, serv2, > serv3). He was doing so well… > > > A network admin came to me and told me to change an MTU on the > cards. I knew it shouldn't be done...I shouldn't have done it. > I did it. > Of course, it didn't work as expected. I went back to my > starting configuration and there I have a big problem with > mariadb which is set up on serv1 and serv2. > > Here are my errors: > > > 2022-02-04 17:40:36 0 [ERROR] WSREP: failed to open gcomm > backend connection: 110: failed to reach primary view: 110 > (Connection timed out) > at gcomm/src/pc.cpp:connect():160 > 2022-02-04 17:40:36 0 [ERROR] WSREP: > gcs/src/gcs_core.cpp:gcs_core_open():209: Failed to open > backend connection: -110 (Connection timed out) > 2022-02-04 17:40:36 0 [ERROR] WSREP: > gcs/src/gcs.cpp:gcs_open():1475: Failed to open channel > 'openstack' at 'gcomm://10.0.5.109:4567,10.0.5.110:4567': <> > -110 (Connection timed out) > 2022-02-04 17:40:36 0 [ERROR] WSREP: gcs connect failed: > Connection timed out > 2022-02-04 17:40:36 0 [ERROR] WSREP: > wsrep::connect(gcomm://10.0.5.109:4567,10.0.5.110:4567 <>) > failed: 7 > 2022-02-04 17:40:36 0 [ERROR] Aborting > > > > > I do not know what to do. My installation is done with > kolla-ansible, mariadb docker restarts every 30 seconds. > > Can the "kolla-ansible reconfigure mariadb" command be a solution? > Could the command "kolla-ansible mariadb recovery" be a solution? > > Thanks in advance if you can help me. > > > > Franck > >