On Mon, 3 Aug 2020 at 21:06, Julia Kreger <juliaashleykreger@gmail.com> wrote:
Greetings awesome humans,
I have a conundrum, and largely it is over stable branch maintenance.
In essence, our stable branch approvers are largely down to Dmitry, Riccardo, and Myself. I think this needs to change and I'd like to propose that we go ahead and change ironic-stable-maint to just include ironic-core in order to prevent the bottleneck and conflict and risk which this presents.
I strongly believe that our existing cores would all do the right thing if presented with the question of if a change needed to be merged. So honestly I'm not concerned by this proposal. Plus, some of our sub-projects have operated this way for quite some time.
Thoughts, concerns, worries?
Makes sense to me. We operate this way in Kolla. It might be good to make sure that current cores are all aware of what 'the right thing' is, that it is written down, and that we include it in the core onboarding process.
-Julia