---- On Fri, 30 Nov 2018 19:05:36 +0900 Thierry Carrez <thierry@openstack.org> wrote ----
Ghanshyam Mann wrote:
---- On Fri, 30 Nov 2018 14:29:24 +0900 Duc Truong <duc.openstack@gmail.com> wrote ----
On Thu, Nov 29, 2018 at 6:39 PM Ghanshyam Mann <gmann@ghanshyammann.com> wrote:
* devstack-vagrant: never released, no change over the past year. Is it meant to be released in the future (cycle-independent) or considered continuously published (release-management:none) or should it be retired ?
I am ok to retire this based on no one using it.
I actually use devstack-vagrant and find it useful to setup consistent devstack environments with minimal effort.
Ok, then we can keep that. I will be happy to add you as maintainer of that if you would like to. I saw you have done some commit and review in Tempest and will be good to have you as devstack-vagrant .
OK so in summary:
eslint-config-openstack, karma-subunit-reporter, devstack-tools -> should be considered cycle-independent (with older releases history imported). Any future release would be done through openstack/releases
devstack-vagrant -> does not need releases or release management, will be marked release-management:none in governance
devstack-plugin-ceph -> does not need releases or cycle-related branching, so will be marked release-management:none in governance
Other devstack-plugins maintainers should pick whether they need to be branched every cycle or not. Oslo-maintained plugins like devstack-plugin-zmq and devstack-plugin-pika will, for example.
Unless someone objects, I'll push the related changes where needed. Thanks for the clarification !
+1. Those looks good. Thanks. -gmann
-- Thierry Carrez (ttx)