Make sense so +1 Le jeu. 10 janv. 2019 14:27, Doug Hellmann <doug@doughellmann.com> a écrit :
"Nguyen Hung, Phuong" <phuongnh@vn.fujitsu.com> writes:
Hi Ben,
I suggest that we either WIP or abandon the current patch series. ... If you have any thoughts about this plan please let me know. Otherwise I will act on it sometime in the near-ish future.
Thanks for your consideration. I am agree with you, please help me to abandon them because I am not privileged with those patches.
Regards, Phuong.
+1 for abandoning them, at least for now. As Ben points out, gerrit will still have copies.
Doug
-----Original Message----- From: Ben Nemec [mailto:openstack@nemebean.com] Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2019 6:12 AM To: Herve Beraud; Nguyen, Hung Phuong Cc: openstack-discuss@lists.openstack.org Subject: Re: [oslo][migrator] RFE Configuration mapping tool for upgrade
- coordinate teams
On 12/20/18 4:41 AM, Herve Beraud wrote:
Le jeu. 20 déc. 2018 à 09:26, Nguyen Hung, Phuong <phuongnh@vn.fujitsu.com <mailto:phuongnh@vn.fujitsu.com>> a écrit :
Hi Ben,
I am apology that in last month we do not have much time maintaining the code.
> but if no one's going to use it then I'd rather cut our > losses than continue pouring time into it.
I agree, we will wait for the community to decide the need for the feature. In the near future, we do not have ability to maintain the code. If anyone has interest to continue maintaining the patch, we will support with document, reviewing... in our possibility.
I can help you to maintain the code if needed.
Personaly I doesn't need this feature so I agree Ben and Doug point of
view.
We need to measure how many this feature is useful and if it make sense to support and maintain more code in the future related to this feature without any usages behind that.
We discussed this again in the Oslo meeting this week, and to share with the wider audience here's what I propose:
Since the team that initially proposed the feature and that we expected to help maintain it are no longer able to do so, and it's not clear to the Oslo team that there is sufficient demand for a rather complex feature like this, I suggest that we either WIP or abandon the current patch series. Gerrit never forgets, so if at some point there are contributors (new or old) who have a vested interest in the feature we can always resurrect it.
If you have any thoughts about this plan please let me know. Otherwise I will act on it sometime in the near-ish future.
In the meantime, if anyone is desperate for Oslo work to do here are a few things that have been lingering on my todo list:
* We have a unit test in oslo.utils (test_excutils) that is still using mox. That needs to be migrated to mock. * oslo.cookiecutter has a number of things that are out of date (doc layout, lack of reno, coverage job). Since it's unlikely we've reached peak Oslo library we should update that so there aren't a bunch of post-creation changes needed like there were with oslo.upgradecheck (and I'm guessing oslo.limit). * The config validator still needs support for dynamic groups, if oslo.config is your thing. * There are 326 bugs open across Oslo projects. Help wanted. :-)
Thanks.
-Ben
-- Doug