- openstack-discuss - lists.openstack.org

[tc] summary of 12 Nov 2018 joint leadership meeting
by Doug Hellmann 20 Nov '18

20 Nov '18

On Monday 12 November, 2018 the OpenStack Foundation Board of Directors, staff, and project leadership held a joint meeting to discuss the project and foundation status [1]. We were hosted by Deutsche Telekom AG in their Berlin Representative Office. The meeting space was inside a room that housed their original telegraph offices built in 1861, and as someone who appreciates old architecture I can say that DT did an excellent job blending the feeling of the old building with the modern fittings needed for meetings like ours. The morning was taken up with a formal Board of Directors meeting, which Jonathan has already summarized at [2]. I won't repeat everything he wrote here, but there were a few topics that may be of particular interest to ATCs. The first is that the board has approved a set of bylaws changes [3] that declare that the Foundation will establish "Open Infrastructure Projects" (OIP), with the governance for each to be approved by the Board. Because the bylaws require a vote of the Foundation members to change, the details are left up to other documentation, which a subcommittee of the Board is going to begin preparing [4]. Completing that work is a prerequisite for Airship, Kata Containers, StarlingX, and Zuul to be confirmed as Foundation projects (they are "pilot" projects now). The current version of the bylaws includes details about the way OpenStack operates, by defining the membership and role of the Technical and User Committees. Those definitions will remain, to signal the "centrality" of the project and, and there are a few proposed wording changes to try to make election scheduling more flexible and to clarify the relationship between the OpenStack Technical and User Committees and the other OIPs. There is also a change to allow the Board and TC to update the "Technical Committee Member Policy" by voting on it together, rather than requiring a full vote of the Foundation members. There are also some minor cleanup and "modernization" of the language (removing obsolete references to bootstrapping directions, for example). There was not a lot of discussion of the changes in this meeting, because there had been several meetings to discuss and refine them before 12 November. Next, these changes need to be approved by the Platinum and Gold foundation members and then approved by the individual members. The goal is to have everything ready for approval during the board election this January. Please watch for the announcements for that vote and participate in the election, so that we have quorum and so the outcome of the vote is binding. The second topic I thought might be of interest is the discussion of the brand research the Foundation staff commissioned and which Wes previously summarized on the mailing list [5]. I was encouraged by the favorability numbers in the responses (67% of respondents rate OpenStack as "favorable" or "very favorable") as well as the 50-60% of overlap between people reporting an interest in OpenStack and in the existing OIPs. The "Open Infrastructure" renaming for the summit (announced last week) was also very popular in the survey results. After the Board meeting concluded, the Technical Committee presented a summary of the work done during Rocky, a preview of the work to be done during Stein (thank you to the PTLs who responded to my request for information) and some of the initiatives the TC is undertaking right now [6]. The Board was very interested in both the peer review culture change that Julia has been driving and the technical vision document that Zane has been writing [7]. Following the TC presentation, the User Committee presented updates on their work, the user survey, and work being done in adjacent communities such as Kubernetes [8]. We wrapped up the afternoon with presentations from each of the existing pilot projects on their mission and status [9]. [1] joint leadership meeting agenda https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Governance/Foundation/12Nov2018BoardMeeting [2] Jonathan’s summary of the Board meeting http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/foundation/2018-November/002654.html [3] bylaws changes http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/foundation-board/2018-November/000459.… [4] Board thread on creating acceptance criteria for OIPs http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/foundation-board/2018-November/000462.… [5] OSF branch research results http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/foundation/2018-October/002634.html [6] TC presentation https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1wcG7InY2A5y67dt5lC14CI1gQHGZ3db8-ys… [7] Vision for OpenStack Clouds https://governance.openstack.org/tc/reference/technical-vision.html [8] UC Presentation https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1gLcChOupELCGItD-SzhECEhFMGQc4jf0PlQ… [9] Pilot project presentations https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1nsm6ht3kJRw7vZsbjLDcTfPA8d8gu3jSYin… -- Doug

1 0

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] Proposing Enrique Llorente Pastora as a core reviewer for TripleO
by Steven Hardy 20 Nov '18

20 Nov '18

On Thu, Nov 15, 2018 at 3:54 PM Sagi Shnaidman <sshnaidm(a)redhat.com> wrote: > > Hi, > I'd like to propose Quique (@quiquell) as a core reviewer for TripleO. Quique is actively involved in improvements and development of TripleO and TripleO CI. He also helps in other projects including but not limited to Infrastructure. > He shows a very good understanding how TripleO and CI works and I'd like suggest him as core reviewer of TripleO in CI related code. > > Please vote! > My +1 is here :) +1! __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

1 0

[docs] looking for help with sitemap generation
by Doug Hellmann 19 Nov '18

19 Nov '18

During Rocky an intern for the OSF started working on a project to build sitemap files for docs.openstack.org. Megan has moved on, and we're looking for someone to pick up and finish that work. What we need is to have the tool to produce the per-doc-build sitemap finished [1], then to update the main doc site build to produce a full sitemap that links to the other existing sitemaps. If you have a little time and interest, please get in touch and I'll be happy to clarify and expand on that description. [1] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/524862/ -- Doug

1 0

[python3] RHEL 8 will include python 3.6
by Doug Hellmann 19 Nov '18

19 Nov '18

Now that the RHEL 8 beta is released, there is more official information about what is included. In particular, the question we've been waiting to have answered is "which version of python 3 will be the default?" The answer is 3.6, which means it should be safe to drop 3.5 testing for Stein. https://developers.redhat.com/blog/2018/11/14/python-in-rhel-8/ -- Doug

1 0

[openstack-dev] [Searchlight] Weekly report, Stein R-21
by Trinh Nguyen 19 Nov '18

19 Nov '18

Hello team, Here is the report for last week, Stein R-21. Please have a look: https://www.dangtrinh.com/2018/11/searchlight-weekly-report-stein-r-21.html Thanks, -- *Trinh Nguyen* *www.edlab.xyz <https://www.edlab.xyz>* __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

1 0

Re: [openstack-dev] [horizon] how to get horizon related logs to syslog?
by Akihiro Motoki 19 Nov '18

19 Nov '18

Hi, Horizon logging depends on Django configuration which supports full python logging [1]. [1] does not provide enough examples. Perhaps [2] will help you (though I haven't tested it). [1] https://docs.djangoproject.com/en/2.0/topics/logging/ [2] https://www.simonkrueger.com/2015/05/27/logging-django-apps-to-syslog.html Thanks, Akihiro 2018年11月16日(金) 18:47 Tikkanen, Viktor (Nokia - FI/Espoo) < viktor.tikkanen(a)nokia.com>: > Hi! > > For most openstack parts (e.g. Aodh, Cinder, Glance, Heat, Ironic, > Keystone, Neutron, Nova) it was easy to get logs to syslog. > > For example for Heat something similar to this (into file > templates/heat.conf.j2): > > # Syslog usage > {% if heat_syslog_enabled %} > use_syslog = True > syslog_log_facility = LOG_LOCAL3 > {% else %} > log_file = /var/log/heat/heat.log > {% endif %} > > But how to get Horizon related logs to syslog? > > -V. > > __________________________________________________________________________ > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

2 1

[openstack-dev] [Searchlight] New team meeting time
by Trinh Nguyen 19 Nov '18

19 Nov '18

Hello team, In order to welcome new contributors to the Searchlight project, we decided to change the meeting time [1]: - Time: 13:30 UCT - Meeting Channel: #openstack-searchlight - Meeting recurrence: bi-weekly starting from 19th Nov. 2018 [1] http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/irclogs/%23openstack-searchlight/latest.log.… Hope that there will be new blood into the project :D -- *Trinh Nguyen* *www.edlab.xyz <https://www.edlab.xyz>* __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

1 0

[glance] time to adjust your ML filters
by Brian Rosmaita 19 Nov '18

19 Nov '18

Hello Glancers, This message is sent from the new openstack-discuss mailing list so that you have a reference point from which to adjust your email filters. See Jeremy's message from earlier today [0] for more information about the new ML. cheers, brian [0] http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2018-November/000000…

1 0

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] Proposing Enrique Llorente Pastora as a core reviewer for TripleO
by Gabriele Cerami 19 Nov '18

19 Nov '18

On 15 Nov, Sagi Shnaidman wrote: > Hi, > I'd like to propose Quique (@quiquell) as a core reviewer for TripleO. > Quique is actively involved in improvements and development of TripleO and > TripleO CI. He also helps in other projects including but not limited to > Infrastructure. It'll be grand. +1 __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

1 0

[ops][docs] operations-docs on StoryBoard
by Frank Kloeker 19 Nov '18

19 Nov '18

Hello, I've started today with a proposal on [1] to add docs for operations on StoryBoard [2].That could be useful to track bugs that people raise while reading the document. Also a rework for parts of the document could be planned in StoryBoard. A reference might be the work on the Contributor Guide which is mostly maintained in [3]. kind regards Frank [1] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/618722/ [2] https://storyboard.openstack.org [3] https://storyboard.openstack.org/#!/project/openstack/contributor-guide

1 0