- openstack-discuss - lists.openstack.org

[openstack-dev] [zun] Failed to create Container
by Rania Adouni 21 Nov '18

21 Nov '18

Hi , I am starting to use zun on openstack pike , and when I try to lunch container with cirros image , I get this reason : Docker internal error: 500 Server Error: Internal Server Error ("legacy plugin: Post http://192.168.1.10:23750/Plugin.Activate: dial tcp 192.168.1.10:23750: connect: connection refused"). you can find here the log on my compute node :https://pastebin.com/nZTiTZiV. some help with this will be great . Best Regards, Rania Adouni __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

3 7

Re: [openstack-dev] [horizon] Do we want new meeting time?
by Ivan Kolodyazhny 21 Nov '18

21 Nov '18

Hi all, Due to the low activity on our weekly meeting, I would like to raise this question again. Do we want a new meeting day and/or time? I'm available any day except Tuesday and Wednesday. I'm going to get some feedback before I create a new poll. Regards, Ivan Kolodyazhny, http://blog.e0ne.info/ On Thu, Apr 5, 2018 at 1:42 PM Ivan Kolodyazhny <e0ne(a)e0ne.info> wrote: > Hi team, > > It's a friendly reminder that we've got voting open [1] until next > meeting. If you would like to attend Horizon meetings, please, select > comfortable options for you. > > [1] https://doodle.com/poll/ei5gstt73d8v3a35 > > Regards, > Ivan Kolodyazhny, > http://blog.e0ne.info/ > > On Wed, Mar 21, 2018 at 6:40 PM, Ivan Kolodyazhny <e0ne(a)e0ne.info> wrote: > >> Hi team, >> >> As was discussed at PTG, usually we've got a very few participants on our >> weekly meetings. I hope, mostly it's because of not comfort meeting time >> for many of us. >> >> Let's try to re-schedule Horizon weekly meetings and get more attendees >> there. I've created a doodle for it [1]. Please, vote for the best time for >> you. >> >> >> [1] https://doodle.com/poll/ei5gstt73d8v3a35 >> >> Regards, >> Ivan Kolodyazhny, >> http://blog.e0ne.info/ >> > > __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

1 0

[openstack-dev] VM stalls with the console log "Exiting boot services and installing virtual address map"
by Srikanth Kumar Lingala 21 Nov '18

21 Nov '18

Hi, I am working with OpenStack stable/pike release in Ubuntu 18.04. When I am trying to spawn VM, which is worked in the earlier OpenStack releases, VM is stalled with the following log in the VM console logs: EFI stub: Booting Linux Kernel... EFI stub: Generating empty DTB EFI stub: Exiting boot services and installing virtual address map... I am observing that VM is in Running status, without any error logs. And, VM is booting with UEFI support. But, I am not able to get VM Console. Earlier I didn't observe this. How can I disable UEFI support, while spawning VM's in OpenStack Nova-Compute. My Libvirt version is 4.0.0. Can someone help me to fix the issue. Regards, Srikanth. -- ---- Srikanth. __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

1 0

[kayobe] Forum summary
by Mark Goddard 21 Nov '18

21 Nov '18

Hi, Thanks to those who attended the kayobe forum session. I'll try to summarise the key points here. The etherpad is here: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/BER-18-kayobe-feedback-roadmap. - Several people were keen for a Rocky release. We're working on this currently, and aim to make it a small one so that we can move to Stein. - The point was raised that the locally installed environment can be hard to keep in sync, and the installation procedure is too complex. We hope to resolve this for the rocky release via https://storyboard.openstack.org/#!/story/2004252 and https://storyboard.openstack.org/#!/story/2004367. - Documentation is lacking in a few areas. We aim to improve this for rocky: https://storyboard.openstack.org/#!/story/2004360. - Ability to import configuration of an existing deployment from kolla-ansible: https://storyboard.openstack.org/#!/story/2004364 - Document/automate bifrost backup procedure: https://storyboard.openstack.org/#!/story/2004359 A few people also requested that we start a regular IRC meeting. Up to now we've favoured ad-hoc IRC communication, but I tend to agree that the time is right. I'll send out a separate email with a poll. Cheers, Mark

1 0

[Openstack] [OpenStack][Compute-Neutron] Is it possible to create flat network from different NICs
by Soheil Pourbafrani 21 Nov '18

21 Nov '18

Hi, I installed OpenStack on One node (for test) and creating a flat external network I could connect VMs to the provider network (internet). In the production environment, we have 4 NIC on each server and each server (compute node) will run 4 instances. My question is, is it possible to create a separate external network based on each NIC (so 4 external networks) and run each instance using one of them? _______________________________________________ Mailing list: http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack Post to : openstack(a)lists.openstack.org Unsubscribe : http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack

2 2

[heat] Meeting canceled this week
by Rico Lin 21 Nov '18

21 Nov '18

Hi team Since we just have summit last week, let's not over-occupied all member's time. we shall resume meeting next week -- May The Force of OpenStack Be With You, *Rico Lin*irc: ricolin

1 0

[keystone][nova] Availability zones and unified limits
by Lance Bragstad 21 Nov '18

21 Nov '18

Unified limits cropped up in a few discussions last week. After describing the current implementation of limits, namely the attributes that make up a limit, someone asked if availability zones were on the roadmap. Ideally, it sounded like they had multiple AZs in a single region, and they wanted to be able to limit usage within the AZ. With the current implementation, regions would be the smallest unit of a deployment they could limit (e.g., limit project Foo to only using 64 compute cores within RegionOne). Instead, the idea would be to limit the number of resources for that project on an AZ within a region. What do people think about adding availability zones to limits? Should it be an official attribute in keystone? What other services would need this outside of nova? There were a few other interesting cases that popped up, but I figured we could start here. I can start another thread if needed and we can keep this specific to discussing limits + AZs. Thoughts?

4 5

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Can we deprecate the server backup API please?
by Matt Riedemann 21 Nov '18

21 Nov '18

On 11/18/2018 6:51 AM, Alex Xu wrote: > Sounds make sense to me, and then we needn't fix this strange behaviour > also https://review.openstack.org/#/c/409644/ The same discussion was had in the spec for that change: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/511825/ Ultimately it amounted to a big "meh, let's just not fix the bug but also no one really cares about deprecating the API either". The only thing deprecating the API would do is signal that it probably shouldn't be used. We would still support it on older microversions. If all anyone cares about is signalling not to use the API then deprecation is probably fine, but I personally don't feel too strongly about it either way. -- Thanks, Matt __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

6 5

[scientific-sig] IRC Meeting today 1100 UTC - Summit wash-up, Manila+Lustre
by Stig Telfer 21 Nov '18

21 Nov '18

Hi All - We have a Scientific SIG IRC meeting today at 1100 UTC in channel #openstack-meeting. Everyone is welcome. This week we’ve got the summit activities to digest, plus similar activities at SC. We’d also like to find out if there’s anyone using Manila to manage Lustre filesystems. Today’s agenda is here: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Scientific_SIG#IRC_Meeting_November_21st_20… Details on how to join our meetings are here: http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/#Scientific_Working_Group Cheers, Stig

1 0

[openstack-dev] [cyborg] [weekly-meeting]
by Li Liu 20 Nov '18

20 Nov '18

There is no weekly IRC meeting for the week of Nov 21st as most of the people are still recovering from the jetlag after the summit. I will follow up with individuals offline. -- Thank you Regards Li __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

1 0