May 2025 - openstack-discuss - lists.openstack.org

[nova] Information Sharing for Arm CCA Feature (Following 4/8 PTG)
by taketani.ryo＠fujitsu.com 15 Jul '25

15 Jul '25

Thank you for the productive discussion about Arm CCA feature [1] at the PTG on April 8th. > The use case for Arm CCA looks ok. But it is a bit early. It is wise to wait at least libvirt / qemu release to have a "stable" code. > We may want to have a OS distribution version (such as Ubuntu XX.YY) which supports Arm CCA so that users can actually use/test the feature The above information is quoted from the PTG Etherpad [2](L316) summary. I'd like to follow up on these points. I'd like to share relevant information about Arm CCA surrounding components (libvirt, QEMU, OS Distributions(e.g., Ubuntu xx.xx), hardware) as it becomes available, and proceed with the discussion step by step.. I'm starting with this email, but if there's a more appropriate method for sharing this type of information, please let me know. Here's the Arm CCA software components information I can share at this time: * Linux Kernel: The roadmap is outlined on the fifth page of the third attachment in this link [3]. The initial commits I've proposed to OpenStack are focused on RMM 1.0. KVM host support for RMM 1.0 will be available in H2 2025. * QEMU Upstream Status: The development is in-progress, awaiting the Linux Kernel merge * libvirt Upstream Status: The development is in-progress, awaiting the QEMU merge * OS Distribution Support: The road map is not clear now > We may want to have a OS distribution version (such as Ubuntu XX.YY) which supports Arm CCA so that users can actually use/test the feature I have a question regarding the above. For design discussions leading to spec approval, I understand that upstream QEMU/libvirt stable release is necessary. Is a specific OS distribution release (e.g., Ubuntu xx.xx) also required for spec approval? [1] https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova-specs/+/938276 [2] https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/nova-2025.2-ptg [3] https://lists.trustedfirmware.org/archives/list/tsc@lists.trustedfirmware.o… Regards, Ryo Taketani

3 11

[skyline] Request to extend core reviewers team
by Vladimir Kozhukalov 10 Jul '25

10 Jul '25

Hi team, The Skyline project seems to be interesting for many users but the review is slow at the moment. Maybe we could call for more volunteers who are able to spend some of their time for review and extend the project core reviewers team. Opinions are welcome. -- Best regards, Kozhukalov Vladimir

3 2

[i18n][infra][horizon] Zanata translation job failures after Python 3.8 deprecation
by Ian Y. Choi 09 Jul '25

09 Jul '25

Hi all, During last week's PTG, the I18n SIG identified Zanata translation job failures for Horizon (and likely related plugins). The root cause appears to be Python 3.8 deprecation on Horizon [1]. Failed jobs have been observed on Zuul [2], and translation proposals were made on Gerrit [3]. Since translation sync on Horizon stable branches is functioning correctly, the error message seems to be related to Python 3.8 deprecation: ERROR: Cannot install -r doc/requirements.txt (line 3) due to conflicting package version dependencies. To address this, I'd like to raise two points: 1/ To resolve the issue, would you support updating translation sync jobs with Bionic-based Zuul jobs by either upgrading to Jammy or modifying the Bionic image to support Python >3.8? 2/ At least me from I18n SIG acknowledges that recognizing these translation job errors was delayed. Moving forward, would it be beneficial to implement periodic (e.g., monthly) reporting on translation job successes and failures? Thank you, /Ian [1] https://docs.openstack.org/releasenotes/horizon/2024.2.html#upgrade-notes [2] https://zuul.opendev.org/t/openstack/builds?job_name=propose-translation-up… [3] https://review.opendev.org/q/owner:proposal-bot+project:openstack/horizon+b…

2 3

[openstack][octavia]Resize a Load Balancer
by Nguyễn Hữu Khôi 24 Jun '25

24 Jun '25

Hello. I see that patch https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/octavia/+/890215 Could I ask why we cannot merge it? Nguyen Huu Khoi

2 3

Problems with the Placement service
by Ron Gage 24 Jun '25

24 Jun '25

5 7

[all][dev][ops][tc] Bridging the gap between community and contributing orgs
by Jeremy Stanley 16 Jun '25

16 Jun '25

The tl;dr on this is that I'm opening a broad community discussion on how we can, collectively through improved communication, better bring together our established contributors with casual and prospective contributors who struggle to find successful patterns of contribution, so that we might all support each other in order to benefit OpenStack as a whole. Read on for details... OpenStack's TC has requested that foundation staff, when in conversation with representatives of member organizations, encourage participation in the project and collect feedback on any related challenges those organizations encounter in their attempts to do so. In order to better understand the feedback and brainstorm achievable recommendations for the broader community[*], Community Managers on the foundation staff started to work with a small focus group of established contributors with a solid understanding of what successful patterns of contribution look like. It also came to light that established contributors experience many of the same sorts of challenges, even more so if they don't have the luxury of focusing full-time upstream, and so success often comes down to knowing how to effectively navigate those challenges. The community's goal with this exercise is to improve everyone's experience, and your help is needed to do that! The most common themes reported by those struggling to contribute are not related to tooling or workflow confusion, but instead seem to come down to basic communication challenges. Ideas so far to address these gaps include: * Review bandwidth - Ensure contributors and companies understand the importance and benefits of code review - Incentivize and credit meaningful "+1" reviews more - Understand that the volume of changes and limited reviewer bandwidth often means proposals aren't reviewed quickly (or at all), and their proponents may need some additional tenacity and engagement with the team to get their work noticed - Utilize "review dashboards" as a way to find stale changes which have fallen through the cracks * Review strategy and etiquette - Be clear about the meaning of votes on changes, especially negative ones, and set explicit timelines for things like "procedural -2" or WIP blocks when their approval needs to be delayed - Focus on comments and requests that affect whether or not the change can be merged after the fixes are submitted, rather than requesting trivial adjustments to an unsuitable change which has more fundamental problems - Reciprocate with reviews of changes from new reviewers you see leaving insubstantial reviews, demonstrating to them what deeper and more meaningful reviewing looks like * Mentoring newcomers - Established contributors with sufficient bandwidth can help mentoring newcomers, potential core reviewers and new leaders - Mentoring can happen as part of internship programs as well as by helping newcomers determined to become active contributors; both ways should be embraced and utilized What challenges are you facing? And, how would you improve them? Two weeks from now, we'll have a forum session at the OpenInfra Summit Asia in Suwon[**] where our community can refine these possible approaches and integrate others, as well as bring attention to them and promote their application. I've also proposed a similar forum session for OpenInfra Days North America in Indianapolis a month after that, where we can hopefully continue this conversation. The goal for this multi-stage effort is to improve the contribution experience for established participants, casual contributors and newcomers alike. While it's easy to jump to blaming in these situations, it will be far more productive if we can focus on the challenges and experiences that we would each like to remove or improve for ourselves and others in our community. As we find ways together to improve our efficiency, we can reduce the load on all contributors and lower the barriers for people to join and participate. [*] https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/r.2205024e55689bccb82c20c960853cb5 [**] https://2024.openinfraasia.org/a/schedule#view=calendar&title=Bridging%20th… -- Jeremy Stanley

2 10

[horizon] Changing the Term “Instance” to “Server” for improved clarity and consistency
by Dmitriy Chubinidze 11 Jun '25

11 Jun '25

Propose changing the term "Instance" to "Server" ( "Instances" to "Servers") in the platform’s user interface. This update will be aiming to improve clarity for users, align with industry terminology, and create a more intuitive experience. "Server" is a more commonly understood term than "Instance", especially for users who are not deeply familiar with cloud computing. Major platforms like AWS and Azure often use "Server" in their UI, even when referring to virtual instances. Adopting this term will make OpenStack easier to use and understand. This change will affect only the visual elements — such as UI labels, menus, and documentation. The underlying code, APIs, and data structures using the term instance will remain unchanged. This ensures there is no impact on functionality or development processes. We are open to feedback and discussion on this proposal.

7 8

[openstack helm] [Glance] Glance showing OSError: unable to receive chunked part when uploading image
by daniel890723＠gmail.com 10 Jun '25

10 Jun '25

Hello i'm testing using Openstack-helm to install all component but after the installation complete i can't upload the OS image through both openstack CLI or Horizon it stuck at Queueing and when i checking Glance Api log it shows 2024-11-07 07:31:19.362 7 INFO glance.api.v2.image_data [None req-2bd28444-196c-42e9-94ef-18443b58310e b39b42e27f8646acad1303711f1dc8b8 e4ab1a6192b9486da698efa311086c53 - - default default] Unable to create trust: no such option collect_timing in group [keystone_authtoken] Use the existing user token. 2024-11-07 07:31:19.400 7 ERROR glance.api.v2.image_data [None req-2bd28444-196c-42e9-94ef-18443b58310e b39b42e27f8646acad1303711f1dc8b8 e4ab1a6192b9486da698efa311086c53 - - default default] Failed to upload image data due to internal error: OSError: unable to receive chunked part 2024-11-07 07:31:19.426 7 ERROR glance.common.wsgi [None req-2bd28444-196c-42e9-94ef-18443b58310e b39b42e27f8646acad1303711f1dc8b8 e4ab1a6192b9486da698efa311086c53 - - default default] Caught error: unable to receive chunked part: OSError: unable to receive chunked part 2024-11-07 07:31:19.426 7 ERROR glance.common.wsgi Traceback (most recent call last): 2024-11-07 07:31:19.426 7 ERROR glance.common.wsgi File "/var/lib/openstack/lib/python3.10/site-packages/glance/common/wsgi.py", line 1302, in __call__ 2024-11-07 07:31:19.426 7 ERROR glance.common.wsgi action_result = self.dispatch(self.controller, action, 2024-11-07 07:31:19.426 7 ERROR glance.common.wsgi File "/var/lib/openstack/lib/python3.10/site-packages/glance/common/wsgi.py", line 1345, in dispatch 2024-11-07 07:31:19.426 7 ERROR glance.common.wsgi return method(*args, **kwargs) 2024-11-07 07:31:19.426 7 ERROR glance.common.wsgi File "/var/lib/openstack/lib/python3.10/site-packages/glance/common/utils.py", line 415, in wrapped 2024-11-07 07:31:19.426 7 ERROR glance.common.wsgi return func(self, req, *args, **kwargs) 2024-11-07 07:31:19.426 7 ERROR glance.common.wsgi File "/var/lib/openstack/lib/python3.10/site-packages/glance/api/v2/image_data.py", line 299, in upload 2024-11-07 07:31:19.426 7 ERROR glance.common.wsgi with excutils.save_and_reraise_exception(): 2024-11-07 07:31:19.426 7 ERROR glance.common.wsgi File "/var/lib/openstack/lib/python3.10/site-packages/oslo_utils/excutils.py", line 227, in __exit__ 2024-11-07 07:31:19.426 7 ERROR glance.common.wsgi self.force_reraise() 2024-11-07 07:31:19.426 7 ERROR glance.common.wsgi File "/var/lib/openstack/lib/python3.10/site-packages/oslo_utils/excutils.py", line 200, in force_reraise 2024-11-07 07:31:19.426 7 ERROR glance.common.wsgi raise self.value 2024-11-07 07:31:19.426 7 ERROR glance.common.wsgi File "/var/lib/openstack/lib/python3.10/site-packages/glance/api/v2/image_data.py", line 162, in upload 2024-11-07 07:31:19.426 7 ERROR glance.common.wsgi image.set_data(data, size, backend=backend) 2024-11-07 07:31:19.426 7 ERROR glance.common.wsgi File "/var/lib/openstack/lib/python3.10/site-packages/glance/notifier.py", line 492, in set_data 2024-11-07 07:31:19.426 7 ERROR glance.common.wsgi with excutils.save_and_reraise_exception(): 2024-11-07 07:31:19.426 7 ERROR glance.common.wsgi File "/var/lib/openstack/lib/python3.10/site-packages/oslo_utils/excutils.py", line 227, in __exit__ 2024-11-07 07:31:19.426 7 ERROR glance.common.wsgi self.force_reraise() 2024-11-07 07:31:19.426 7 ERROR glance.common.wsgi File "/var/lib/openstack/lib/python3.10/site-packages/oslo_utils/excutils.py", line 200, in force_reraise 2024-11-07 07:31:19.426 7 ERROR glance.common.wsgi raise self.value 2024-11-07 07:31:19.426 7 ERROR glance.common.wsgi File "/var/lib/openstack/lib/python3.10/site-packages/glance/notifier.py", line 443, in set_data 2024-11-07 07:31:19.426 7 ERROR glance.common.wsgi self.repo.set_data(data, size, backend=backend, 2024-11-07 07:31:19.426 7 ERROR glance.common.wsgi File "/var/lib/openstack/lib/python3.10/site-packages/glance/quota/__init__.py", line 322, in set_data 2024-11-07 07:31:19.426 7 ERROR glance.common.wsgi self.image.set_data(data, size=size, backend=backend, 2024-11-07 07:31:19.426 7 ERROR glance.common.wsgi File "/var/lib/openstack/lib/python3.10/site-packages/glance/location.py", line 596, in set_data 2024-11-07 07:31:19.426 7 ERROR glance.common.wsgi self._upload_to_store(data, verifier, backend, size) 2024-11-07 07:31:19.426 7 ERROR glance.common.wsgi File "/var/lib/openstack/lib/python3.10/site-packages/glance/location.py", line 487, in _upload_to_store 2024-11-07 07:31:19.426 7 ERROR glance.common.wsgi multihash, loc_meta) = self.store_api.add_with_multihash( 2024-11-07 07:31:19.426 7 ERROR glance.common.wsgi File "/var/lib/openstack/lib/python3.10/site-packages/glance_store/multi_backend.py", line 397, in add_with_multihash 2024-11-07 07:31:19.426 7 ERROR glance.common.wsgi return store_add_to_backend_with_multihash( 2024-11-07 07:31:19.426 7 ERROR glance.common.wsgi File "/var/lib/openstack/lib/python3.10/site-packages/glance_store/multi_backend.py", line 479, in store_add_to_backend_with_multihash 2024-11-07 07:31:19.426 7 ERROR glance.common.wsgi (location, size, checksum, multihash, metadata) = store.add( 2024-11-07 07:31:19.426 7 ERROR glance.common.wsgi File "/var/lib/openstack/lib/python3.10/site-packages/glance_store/driver.py", line 294, in add_adapter 2024-11-07 07:31:19.426 7 ERROR glance.common.wsgi metadata_dict) = store_add_fun(*args, **kwargs) 2024-11-07 07:31:19.426 7 ERROR glance.common.wsgi File "/var/lib/openstack/lib/python3.10/site-packages/glance_store/capabilities.py", line 176, in op_checker 2024-11-07 07:31:19.426 7 ERROR glance.common.wsgi return store_op_fun(store, *args, **kwargs) 2024-11-07 07:31:19.426 7 ERROR glance.common.wsgi File "/var/lib/openstack/lib/python3.10/site-packages/glance_store/_drivers/filesystem.py", line 764, in add 2024-11-07 07:31:19.426 7 ERROR glance.common.wsgi raise errors.get(e.errno, e) 2024-11-07 07:31:19.426 7 ERROR glance.common.wsgi File "/var/lib/openstack/lib/python3.10/site-packages/glance_store/_drivers/filesystem.py", line 746, in add 2024-11-07 07:31:19.426 7 ERROR glance.common.wsgi for buf in utils.chunkreadable(image_file, 2024-11-07 07:31:19.426 7 ERROR glance.common.wsgi File "/var/lib/openstack/lib/python3.10/site-packages/glance_store/common/utils.py", line 73, in chunkiter 2024-11-07 07:31:19.426 7 ERROR glance.common.wsgi chunk = fp.read(chunk_size) 2024-11-07 07:31:19.426 7 ERROR glance.common.wsgi File "/var/lib/openstack/lib/python3.10/site-packages/glance/common/utils.py", line 294, in read 2024-11-07 07:31:19.426 7 ERROR glance.common.wsgi result = self.data.read(i) 2024-11-07 07:31:19.426 7 ERROR glance.common.wsgi File "/var/lib/openstack/lib/python3.10/site-packages/glance/common/utils.py", line 121, in readfn 2024-11-07 07:31:19.426 7 ERROR glance.common.wsgi result = fd.read(*args) 2024-11-07 07:31:19.426 7 ERROR glance.common.wsgi File "/var/lib/openstack/lib/python3.10/site-packages/glance/common/format_inspector.py", line 956, in read 2024-11-07 07:31:19.426 7 ERROR glance.common.wsgi chunk = self._source.read(size) 2024-11-07 07:31:19.426 7 ERROR glance.common.wsgi File "/var/lib/openstack/lib/python3.10/site-packages/glance/common/wsgi.py", line 1045, in read 2024-11-07 07:31:19.426 7 ERROR glance.common.wsgi data = uwsgi.chunked_read() 2024-11-07 07:31:19.426 7 ERROR glance.common.wsgi OSError: unable to receive chunked part 2024-11-07 07:31:19.426 7 ERROR glance.common.wsgi Ceph Cluster Status: NAME DATADIRHOSTPATH MONCOUNT AGE PHASE MESSAGE HEALTH EXTERNAL FSID ceph /var/lib/rook 3 82m Ready Cluster created successfully HEALTH_OK 5cf8b9bb-13e1-4c31-b47d-9e7d92c3c05d Ceph osd status: ID CLASS WEIGHT REWEIGHT SIZE RAW USE DATA OMAP META AVAIL %USE VAR PGS STATUS TYPE NAME -1 0.35156 - 360 GiB 3.3 GiB 493 MiB 0 B 2.8 GiB 357 GiB 0.91 1.00 - root default -5 0.11719 - 120 GiB 1.1 GiB 164 MiB 0 B 964 MiB 119 GiB 0.92 1.01 - host instance-lu-1 2 hdd 0.11719 1.00000 120 GiB 1.1 GiB 164 MiB 0 B 964 MiB 119 GiB 0.92 1.01 195 up osd.2 -3 0.11719 - 120 GiB 1.1 GiB 164 MiB 0 B 951 MiB 119 GiB 0.91 1.00 - host instance-lu-2 0 hdd 0.11719 1.00000 120 GiB 1.1 GiB 164 MiB 0 B 951 MiB 119 GiB 0.91 1.00 195 up osd.0 -7 0.11719 - 120 GiB 1.1 GiB 164 MiB 0 B 951 MiB 119 GiB 0.91 1.00 - host instance-lu-3 1 hdd 0.11719 1.00000 120 GiB 1.1 GiB 164 MiB 0 B 951 MiB 119 GiB 0.91 1.00 197 up osd.1 TOTAL 360 GiB 3.3 GiB 493 MiB 0 B 2.8 GiB 357 GiB 0.91 MIN/MAX VAR: 1.00/1.01 STDDEV: 0.01 now i'm able to create Empty Volume using horizon(can't create volume using default cirros image ) and i can start an Instance without volume and mount the empty volume in(Ceph also can detect when i use that volume) is there something i need to set when starting glance? because i'm following the Openstack-helm installation document to install openstack with helm

4 7

[designate] Support for quorum queues
by Thomas Goirand 06 Jun '25

06 Jun '25

Hi, When setting-up Designate with quorum queues, when designate-central starts, I get: Queue.declare: (406) PRECONDITION_FAILED - invalid property 'non-durable' for queue 'central' in vhost '/' Does Designate support quorum queues? If so, how com it's trying to set 'non-durable', which doesn't exist as attribute, at least with RabbitMQ 4.0.5? Cheers, Thomas Goirand (zigo)

6 6

[Neutron][operators] LinuxBridge to OVN Outreach
by Daniel Failing 05 Jun '25

05 Jun '25

Hi all, Following on the good session we had last time discussing migrating out of LinuxBridge between operators, it was proposed to meet again in June. To find a good time slot, please respond to the following survey: https://newdle.cern.ch/newdle/TtbH8Dbv For reference, the notes from last meeting: https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/neutron-lb-ovn-migration Best, Daniel Failing CERN Cloud Infrastructure

1 1

[neutron] Approach to a spec for OVN BGP integration (RFE 2111276)
by Frode Nordahl 04 Jun '25

04 Jun '25

Hello, Jakub, Thank you for filing the RFE for Neutron support for OVN native support for route exchange, which includes BGP. We appear to have a common goal of making use of this with OpenStack, and we have time set aside this cycle to work towards this goal. Communication through IRC and e-mail often has limited bandwidth, and I wonder if you would be interested in participating in a A/V sync on some cadence to get us off the ground with the initial spec work. We have good experience with how the core OVN A/V sync is organized and we could do something similar for this. WDYT? -- Frode Nordahl

6 9

[cinder]How do I configure Cinder to recognize free space in the data pool when using a Ceph Erasure Coded Pool?
by Yuta Kambe (Fujitsu) 04 Jun '25

04 Jun '25

Hi everyone, I'm using a Ceph Erasure Coded pool as the backend for OpenStack Cinder. I've created a replicated pool (volumes_meta) for metadata and an erasure-coded pool (volumes_data) for data, following the documentation here: https://docs.ceph.com/en/latest/rados/operations/erasure-code/ When I set rbd_pool to volumes_meta in cinder.conf, I receive an "Insufficient free virtual space" error, even though volumes_data has ample free space. This is because Cinder is calculating free space based on the metadata pool. When rbd_pool is set to volumes_data, Cinder correctly calculates free space based on the data pool. However, I then encounter an "RBD operation not supported" error during volume creation. I need Cinder to recognize the free space available in volumes_data while avoiding the "RBD operation not supported" error. I'm unsure how to configure this correctly and would appreciate any advice. The following is supplemental information. cinder.conf is: [ceph] volume_driver = cinder.volume.drivers.rbd.RBDDriver volume_backend_name = ceph rbd_pool = volumes_meta rbd_ceph_conf = /etc/ceph/ceph.conf rbd_flatten_volume_from_snapshot = false rbd_max_clone_depth = 5 rbd_store_chunk_size = 4 rados_connect_timeout = -1 rbd_user = cinder rbd_secret_uuid = <uuid> For example, if the pool usage is as follows, Cinder gets 1.6TiB as the pool free space: $ ceph df --- POOLS --- POOL ID PGS STORED OBJECTS USED %USED MAX AVAIL volumes_meta 4 32 40 KiB 24 189 KiB 0 1.6 TiB volumes_data 7 32 61 GiB 15.67k 92 GiB 2.80 2.1 TiB $ cinder get-pools --detail +-----------------------------+-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------+ | Property | Value | +-----------------------------+-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------+ | allocated_capacity_gb | 523 | | backend_state | up | | driver_version | 1.3.0 | | filter_function | None | | free_capacity_gb | 1592.07 <-★free capacity of volumes_meta | | goodness_function | None | | location_info | ceph:/etc/ceph/ceph.conf:<uuid>:cinder:volumes_meta | | max_over_subscription_ratio | 20.0 | | multiattach | True | | name | <hostname>@ceph#ceph | | qos_support | True | | replication_enabled | False | | reserved_percentage | 0 | | storage_protocol | ceph | | thin_provisioning_support | True | | timestamp | 2025-05-29T07:44:17.903149 | | total_capacity_gb | 1592.07 | | vendor_name | Open Source | | volume_backend_name | ceph | +-----------------------------+-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------+ OpenStack and Ceph versions are: $ ceph -v ceph version 17.2.8 (f817ceb7f187defb1d021d6328fa833eb8e943b3) quincy (stable) $ dnf list --installed | grep openstack-cinder openstack-cinder.noarch 1:21.3.2-1.el9s @centos-openstack-zed

4 4

[ops][largescale-sig][scientific-sig] Ops Radio Hour on May 30, 2025
by Ildiko Vancsa 02 Jun '25

02 Jun '25

Hi OpenStack Community, I'm reaching out to you to draw your attention to a new online gathering called Ops Radio Hour. The call series is a casual setting for operators, engineers, and contributors to come together, share knowledge, and collaborate on the complexities of managing and deploying OpenStack environments. The first meeting is scheduled to May 30, 2025 at 1400UTC [1]. The call will happen on Meetpad, and you can find the agenda on the etherpad[2] created for the series. See You there! Best Regards, Ildikó [1] https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Operations/Meetups#2025_Ops_Radio_Hour_Seri… [2] https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/openstack_ops_radiohour

2 4

[telemetry] Nominate Jaromír Wysoglad to Telemetry Core
by Juan Larriba 02 Jun '25

02 Jun '25

Hi, One of the things I wanted to do when becoming PTL of telemetry was to revive the interest in the community as I sensed that telemetry had been left a little bit behind from the rest of the projects. Since then, there has been a lot of movement: new Ceilometer features were added and even new projects (aethos, a prometheus-keystone proxy and grian-ui, a new metric displaying dashboard for Horizon) which has showed that the interest in gathering and displaying better and more scalable metrics is only growing. In these circumstances, the very small core contributor team needs to grow to keep up with all the influx of new features coming from the amazing community and I cannot think of anyone better than Jaromír Wysoglad to fulfill that role. Jaromír has been involved in the telemetry upstream community for years, tirelessly working to, among other things, make the whole telemetry suite to be compatible with Prometheus storage. He has implemented Prometheus compatibility with aodh, python-observabilityclient and many other things, including maintaining and improving the telemetry tempest test suite. Recently he created and is writing from scratch aetos, the new openstack-prometheus compatibility layer. I can't see a better contributor to the core group. If I don't hear any objections for one week, I'll add Jaromír to the group. Best Regards, Juan Larriba

3 3

Create image error
by BEDDA Fadhel 31 May '25

31 May '25

Hi everyone, I installed OpenStack (DevStack). At first, I was able to create three images (Ubuntu, Debian, and Windows) in addition to the Cirros image. When I tried to add another image, everything got stuck. I couldn't add any images, and I got the infamous error 550. HttpException: 502: Server Error for url:

2 1

[ops] Matrix room created #openstack-ops:opendev.org
by Jeremy Stanley 30 May '25

30 May '25

Discussion during today's Ops Radio Hour at one point led to talking about real-time/synchronous chat platforms. Consensus seemed to be that it was worth starting a Matrix room on the OpenDev Collaboratory's homeserver for OpenStack Ops discussions, and see how it works out for everyone. Visit https://matrix.to/#/#openstack-ops:opendev.org if you want to check it out. If you're already logged into your Matrix account then the "Continue" button should take you right to the room. If you're not logged in then it should prompt you to pick a client (choose Element and continue in your browser if you don't feel like installing a client right now) and then to sign in or create an account. If you choose to create an account at that point, it painlessly walks you through creating one on matrix.org (though you can join with an account from any other homeserver instead, if you prefer). -- Jeremy Stanley

1 0

Create image
by BEDDA Fadhel 30 May '25

30 May '25

Aidez moi svp HttpException: 502: Server Error for url: http://192.168.30.10/image/v2/images/2440ca4f-7a35-4fd1-88b2-5e4f269ef5d8/f…, 502 Bad Gateway: Bad Gateway: The proxy server received an invalid: response from an upstream server.: Apache/2.4.58 (Ubuntu) Server at 192.168.30.10 Port 80 Cdt

1 0

[ops] ops radio May 30 2025
by Chris Morgan 30 May '25

30 May '25

Hey Folks, Tomorrow the openstack ops meetups team (such as it is) would like to try something different, we're calling it "ops radio" a bit like talk radio. I posted a little about it here https://fosstodon.org/@osopsmeetup/114585889262579171 Time : 14:00 UTC which is 10am here (NYC). Just an hour free-form meeting on openinfra's jitsi so it's quite like just another zoom meeting. The jitsi link and agenda link are here on the ops meetups wiki: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Operations/Meetups The idea is if people like this we could aim to do it regularly since in-person meetups have become much rarer and harder to do and since the community seems to be somewhat distributed across reddit, linkedin, mastodon, irc, mailing lists, bluesky, matrix, slack etc. technical topics will include the usual things like architecture. tools, upgrades, pain points depending on what people who attend want to discuss. Chris -- Chris Morgan <mihalis68(a)gmail.com>

1 1

some operations are available only to the administrator, regardless of the policies?
by sluge＠mail.ru 29 May '25

29 May '25

Hi everyone, I'm currently writing a custom nova's policy for my new role myrole. The current task is to create a role for a user with member role already assigned to see servers from other project. For example, I got a token for my user in project1, but want to see servers on project2, where my user has a member and myrole roles also. I added to nova's policy.json line: "os_compute_api:servers:show": "rule:project_reader_or_admin or role:myrole" I already assigned to my user roles member and myrole in the project1 and project2. But I always got a 404 error when I want to show servers from project2. I get 404 even when I use "os_compute_api:servers:show": "" i.e. always true. It only works if I use token of admin user or my user has admin role in project2. It looks like some operations are available for admins only?

3 3

[openstack-helm][loci] Retire Centos based images
by Vladimir Kozhukalov 28 May '25

28 May '25

Hi team, We have a bunch of Centos related stuff in the Loci repo. However we've not been building and testing centos based images for quite some time. Is anybody still interested in having/maintaining this stuff? I am talking about [1] - [5]. [1] https://opendev.org/openstack/loci/src/branch/master/dockerfiles/centos [2] https://opendev.org/openstack/loci/src/branch/master/scripts/install.sh#L37… [3] https://opendev.org/openstack/loci/src/branch/master/scripts/collect_info.s… [4] https://opendev.org/openstack/loci/src/branch/master/scripts/install_packag… [5] https://opendev.org/openstack/loci/src/branch/master/scripts/cleanup.sh#L14… -- Best regards, Kozhukalov Vladimir

1 1

Re: [neutron] Switching the ML2 driver in-place from linuxbridge to OVN for an existing Cloud
by Ohnsorge Borys 28 May '25

28 May '25

Hi James, I know this topic is old, but have you had the time/opportunity to describe the migration process based on openstack-ansible You mentioned? __ Best regards Borys Ohnsorge

2 1

[largescale-sig] Next meeting: May 28, 15utc
by Thierry Carrez 28 May '25

28 May '25

Hi everyone, The Large Scale SIG will be meeting this Wednesday in #openstack-operators on OFTC IRC at 15UTC. You can doublecheck how that UTC time translates locally at: https://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?iso=20250528T15 Feel free to add topics to the agenda: https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/large-scale-sig-meeting Regards, -- Thierry Carrez

1 1

[openstack-ansible] [Antelope]operating upgrade from ubuntu 20 to ubuntu 22 on infra nodes
by Danish Khan 27 May '25

27 May '25

Dear Team, I am trying to upgrade Operating system of Infra node from ubuntu 20 to ubuntu 22. And I am following below docs for same: https://docs.openstack.org/openstack-ansible/2023.1/admin/upgrades/distribu… When I run: openstack-ansible setup-hosts.yml --limit localhost,reinstalled_host* I thought it would upgrade OS of LXC containers as well. I can see ubuntu-22-amd64 in /var/lib/lxc/ and /var/lib/machines/ I can see ubuntu-22-amd64 even when I run lxc-ls command. Should I destroy and recreate lxc containers one by one to upgrade it to ubuntu 22? or is there any playbook which can take care of this? Regards, Danish Khan

2 1

[OpenStack Kolla] Unable to upload image from Horizon
by ankit1999raikwar＠gmail.com 26 May '25

26 May '25

Hello All, We have deployed the latest version of the OpenStack using the Kolla-ansible deployment. Issue description: When we are uploading image from the horizon dashboard using the with the privilege of admin or any other normal user getting below error. we are using the ceph storage as the backend. Error: Type Error: response is undefined and Unable to create Image Details: 1. From CLI I'm able to Upload the image 2. From Horizon getting Error Command Line Interface openstack image create cirros-01 --disk-format qcow2 --file cirros-0.6.2-x86_64-disk.img Output: +------------------+--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+ | Field | Value | +------------------+--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+ | checksum | c8fc807773e5354afe61636071771906 | | container_format | bare | | created_at | 2025-05-26T05:03:04Z | | disk_format | qcow2 | | file | /v2/images/f4bba9a3-8640-4162-b9de-0b7e29d32dcf/file | | id | f4bba9a3-8640-4162-b9de-0b7e29d32dcf | | min_disk | 0 | | min_ram | 0 | | name | cirros-01 | | owner | 302edafdf0114b41acad32725668cd13 | | properties | os_hash_algo='sha512', | | | os_hash_value='1103b92ce8ad966e41235a4de260deb791ff571670c0342666c8582fbb9caefe6af07ebb11d34f44f8414b609b29c1bdf1d72ffa6faa39c88e8721d09847952b', | | | os_hidden='False', owner_specified.openstack.md5='', owner_specified.openstack.object='images/cirros-01', owner_specified.openstack.sha256='', stores='rbd' | | protected | False | | schema | /v2/schemas/image | | size | 21430272 | | status | active | | tags | | | updated_at | 2025-05-26T05:03:05Z | | virtual_size | 117440512 | | visibility | shared | +------------------+--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+ openstack image list +--------------------------------------+-----------+--------+ | ID | Name | Status | +--------------------------------------+-----------+--------+ | 6b92f1ae-9726-469b-a350-f116c36e61d7 | cirros | active | | f4bba9a3-8640-4162-b9de-0b7e29d32dcf | cirros-01 | active | +--------------------------------------+-----------+--------+ From CLI images getting created from cli but we have notice from horizon we are getting error but also in the backend image getting queued. (kolla-venv) root@controller-01:~# openstack image list +--------------------------------------+-----------+--------+ | ID | Name | Status | +--------------------------------------+-----------+--------+ | 5f030764-af42-437d-b6ee-670218a0c4e4 | ankit | queued | | 0195c152-f2b7-42f1-91b4-5e65f7588889 | ankit | queued | | 6b92f1ae-9726-469b-a350-f116c36e61d7 | cirros | active | | f4bba9a3-8640-4162-b9de-0b7e29d32dcf | cirros-01 | active | +--------------------------------------+-----------+--------+ Queued Image (kolla-venv) root@controller-01:~# openstack image show 5f030764-af42-437d-b6ee-670218a0c4e4 +------------------+------------------------------------------------------+ | Field | Value | +------------------+------------------------------------------------------+ | container_format | bare | | created_at | 2025-05-26T05:45:02Z | | disk_format | qcow2 | | file | /v2/images/5f030764-af42-437d-b6ee-670218a0c4e4/file | | id | 5f030764-af42-437d-b6ee-670218a0c4e4 | | min_disk | 0 | | min_ram | 0 | | name | ankit | | owner | 302edafdf0114b41acad32725668cd13 | | properties | os_hidden='False' | | protected | False | | schema | /v2/schemas/image | | status | queued | | tags | | | updated_at | 2025-05-26T05:45:02Z | | visibility | shared | +------------------+------------------------------------------------------+ Active Image (kolla-venv) root@controller-01:~# openstack image show 6b92f1ae-9726-469b-a350-f116c36e61d7 +------------------+--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+ | Field | Value | +------------------+--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+ | checksum | c8fc807773e5354afe61636071771906 | | container_format | bare | | created_at | 2025-05-26T05:02:02Z | | disk_format | qcow2 | | file | /v2/images/6b92f1ae-9726-469b-a350-f116c36e61d7/file | | id | 6b92f1ae-9726-469b-a350-f116c36e61d7 | | min_disk | 0 | | min_ram | 0 | | name | cirros | | owner | 302edafdf0114b41acad32725668cd13 | | properties | os_hash_algo='sha512', | | | os_hash_value='1103b92ce8ad966e41235a4de260deb791ff571670c0342666c8582fbb9caefe6af07ebb11d34f44f8414b609b29c1bdf1d72ffa6faa39c88e8721d09847952b', | | | os_hidden='False', owner_specified.openstack.md5='', owner_specified.openstack.object='images/cirros', owner_specified.openstack.sha256='', stores='rbd' | | protected | False | | schema | /v2/schemas/image | | size | 21430272 | | status | active | | tags | | | updated_at | 2025-05-26T05:02:03Z | | virtual_size | 117440512 | | visibility | shared | +------------------+--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+ Please find the horizon logs also 2025-05-26 04:53:24.723082 /var/lib/kolla/venv/lib/python3.12/site-packages/oslo_policy/policy.py:1133: UserWarning: Policy "modify_image": "rule:context_is_admin or (role:member and project_id:%(project_id)s)" failed scope check. The token used to make the request was domain scoped but the policy requires ['project'] scope. This behavior may change in the future where using the intended scope is required 2025-05-26 04:53:24.723167 warnings.warn(msg) 2025-05-26 04:53:24.732065 /var/lib/kolla/venv/lib/python3.12/site-packages/oslo_policy/policy.py:1133: UserWarning: Policy "reactivate": "rule:context_is_admin or (role:member and project_id:%(project_id)s)" failed scope check. The token used to make the request was domain scoped but the policy requires ['project'] scope. This behavior may change in the future where using the intended scope is required 2025-05-26 04:53:24.732130 warnings.warn(msg) 2025-05-26 04:53:34.669166 /var/lib/kolla/venv/lib/python3.12/site-packages/oslo_policy/policy.py:1133: UserWarning: Policy "os_compute_api:os-simple-tenant-usage:show": "rule:project_reader_or_admin" failed scope check. The token used to make the request was domain scoped but the policy requires ['project'] scope. This behavior may change in the future where using the intended scope is required 2025-05-26 04:53:34.669253 warnings.warn(msg) 2025-05-26 04:53:34.670620 /var/lib/kolla/venv/lib/python3.12/site-packages/oslo_policy/policy.py:1133: UserWarning: Policy "os_compute_api:os-quota-sets:update": "rule:context_is_admin" failed scope check. The token used to make the request was domain scoped but the policy requires ['project'] scope. This behavior may change in the future where using the intended scope is required 2025-05-26 04:53:34.670653 warnings.warn(msg) 2025-05-26 04:54:01.749398 /var/lib/kolla/venv/lib/python3.12/site-packages/openstack_dashboard/api/keystone.py:408: DeprecationWarning: Using the 'project' argument is deprecated in version '1.7.0' and will be removed in version '2.0.0', please use the 'default_project' argument instead 2025-05-26 04:54:01.749516 users = keystoneclient(request, admin=True).users.list(**kwargs) 2025-05-26 04:54:28.131860 /var/lib/kolla/venv/lib/python3.12/site-packages/oslo_policy/policy.py:1133: UserWarning: Policy "deactivate": "rule:context_is_admin or (role:member and project_id:%(project_id)s)" failed scope check. The token used to make the request was domain scoped but the policy requires ['project'] scope. This behavior may change in the future where using the intended scope is required 2025-05-26 04:54:28.131939 warnings.warn(msg) 2025-05-26 04:54:33.886717 Project switch successful for user "admin". 2025-05-26 04:54:44.853694 Forbidden: /api/glance/images/4b2517db-1352-45ed-ae87-5a6179bc3422/actions/reactivate 2025-05-26 04:54:51.522777 /var/lib/kolla/venv/lib/python3.12/site-packages/oslo_policy/policy.py:1133: UserWarning: Policy "deactivate": "rule:context_is_admin or (role:member and project_id:%(project_id)s)" failed scope check. The token used to make the request was domain scoped but the policy requires ['project'] scope. This behavior may change in the future where using the intended scope is required 2025-05-26 04:54:51.522876 warnings.warn(msg) 2025-05-26 04:55:07.647877 Project switch successful for user "admin". 2025-05-26 04:55:09.798541 OPENSTACK_IMAGE_BACKEND has a format "" unsupported by glance 2025-05-26 04:55:09.798708 OPENSTACK_IMAGE_BACKEND has a format "docker" unsupported by glance 2025-05-26 04:55:09.798760 OPENSTACK_IMAGE_BACKEND has a format "ova" unsupported by glance 2025-05-26 05:03:59.763647 /var/lib/kolla/venv/lib/python3.12/site-packages/oslo_policy/policy.py:1133: UserWarning: Policy "communitize_image": "rule:context_is_admin or (role:member and project_id:%(project_id)s)" failed scope check. The token used to make the request was domain scoped but the policy requires ['project'] scope. This behavior may change in the future where using the intended scope is required 2025-05-26 05:03:59.763801 warnings.warn(msg) Please help to solve this issue. also I don't see any issue or error in the glance api logs

2 2

[neutron] Bug deputy report (week starting on May 19)
by Elvira Garcia Ruiz 26 May '25

26 May '25

Hi folks! Here you have the list of bugs reported for Neutron during last week. It’s been a busy week. There are a couple of them that I left undecided since I don’t feel knowledgeable enough about the issue. We can discuss them at the team meeting if that's ok. (19 May - 25 May) Critical --------- - https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/2111262 [wntp] test_attach_qos_port_to_vm_with_another_port should create VMs on different computes Fix merged by Eduardo Olivares https://review.opendev.org/c/x/whitebox-neutron-tempest-plugin/+/950296 High ------ - https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/2111272 security group delete fails with PgDelCommand.*exceeded timeout 180 seconds, cause: Result queue is empty Unassigned - https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/2111414 [eventlet-removal] Remove the usage of eventlet in unit tests Fix proposed by Rodolfo https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/neutron/+/950502 - https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/2111417 [eventlet-removal] Remove the usage of eventlet in functional tests Fix proposed by Rodolfo https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/neutron/+/950521 - https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/2111422 [eventlet-removal] Remove the usage of eventlet in fullstack tests Unassigned - https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/2111498 [OVN] Mechanism driver fails to fix router_ports: KeyError 'neutron:provnet-network-type' Unassigned. Set this as high but I would like to have someone else take a look at this one. - https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/2111593 [ovn] Race between FIP NAT entry creation and OVN port status update Fix proposed by Dmitrii Shcherbakov https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/neutron/+/950757 Medium ----------- - https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/2111475 openstack network agent list cannot return new added metadata agent Fix proposed https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/neutron/+/950624 (needs to be proposed on master) - https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/2111572 [OVN] OVN ML2 mech driver forces port update to networking generic switch (NGS) on OVS restart Unassigned - https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/2111584 Failed to get list of ports due to removed network Unassigned. I set it as low hanging fruit since the issue is quite spotted already. Low ------ - https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/2111330 [FT] Error in ``test_pb_type_empty`` test Unassigned Wishlist ----------- - https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/2111276 [RFE] Integrate OVN BGP capabilities into Neutron OVN driver Unassigned. Should be discussed in the drivers meeting. Undecided --------------- - https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/2111254 [ovn] distributed fip missing external_mac Unassigned. I asked froyo if he could take a look at this since the reporter encountered this on an env with octavia. - https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/2111496 Neutron port stuck in DOWN state after update router external connectivity Unassigned - https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/2111660 OVN_AGENT_NEUTRON_SB_CFG_KEY doesn't set when Neutron OVN Agent starts Unassigned Best regards, Elvira

1 0