January 2025 - openstack-discuss - lists.openstack.org

[publiccloud-sig] Reminder: first meeting of the new year - January 15th at 0800 UTC
by Felix Kronlage-Dammers 14 Jan '25

14 Jan '25

Hi everyone, This upcoming Wednesday (January 15th) the next meeting of the publiccloud-sig is going to happen. We’ll be meeting at 0800 UTC here: https://meetpad.opendev.org/publiccloud-sig See also here for all other details: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/PublicCloudSIG felix -- Felix Kronlage-Dammers Tel.: +49-30-206539-205 | Matrix: @fkronlage:matrix.org | fkr(a)osb-alliance.com

1 0

[all][tc] Election dates for the 2025.2 cycle
by Sławek Kapłoński 14 Jan '25

14 Jan '25

Hi, To align with the proposal from Goutham [1] we have updated election calendar for the upcoming elections [2] to make voting period slightly longer thus nomination will also start earlier. Please be aware of it. New calendar looks like: Release is at: 2025-04-02 Latest possible completion is at: 2025-03-19 Moving back to Wednesday: 2025-03-19 PTL Election from 2025-02-26T23:45 to 2025-03-19T23:45 TC Election from 2025-02-26T23:45 to 2025-03-19T23:45 TC Campaigning from 2025-02-19T23:45 to 2025-02-26T23:45 PTL Nominations from 2025-02-05T23:45 to 2025-02-19T23:45 TC Nominations from 2025-02-05T23:45 to 2025-02-19T23:45 Set email_deadline to 2025-02-19T00:00 Setting TC timeframe end to email_deadline Begining of 2024.2 Cycle @ 2024-03-15 00:00:00+00:00 End of 2025.1 cycle @ 2025-02-19 00:00:00+00:00 Election timeframe: 341 days, 0:00:00s --- [1] https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/governance/+/937741 [2] https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/election/+/938782/ -- Slawek Kaplonski Principal Software Engineer Red Hat

1 0

Dalmatian Devstack: Empty Port Binding section in Horizon
by berndbausch＠gmail.com 14 Jan '25

14 Jan '25

Is there a known bug, either in Devstack or Horizon, that prevents Neutron port binding details from being displayed? My googling did not find anything. As admin, I open a port's details, and in the Binding section at the end of the page, all I get is a bold text "VNIC Type". The CLI command "openstack port show" does provide the details. Also on a Xena Devstack, Horizon displays them[1]. Horizon's setup.py seems to be identical on both releases, as far as Neutron configuration is concerned. Thanks for any input. Bernd. [1] The Binding details I expect: Binding VNIC Type Normal Host xena-202 Profile None VIF Type ovs VIF Details connectivity l2 port_filter True ovs_hybrid_plug False datapath_type system bridge_name br-int

2 1

[tc][all] OpenStack Technical Committee Weekly Summary and Meeting Agenda (2025.1/R-11)
by Goutham Pacha Ravi 14 Jan '25

14 Jan '25

Hello Stackers, Time flies! We're 11 weeks away from the 2025.1 "Epoxy" release day [1]. OpenStack project teams must be working on their deliverables according to the schedule shared by Előd Illés (elodilles) from the release team [2] this week. In the past week, the OpenStack Technical Committee (TC) worked with election officials to adjust the dates of the elections preceding the 2025.2 ("Flamingo" [3]) release cycle. This change was made in response to a revision in the TC's charter that now allows more time for polling. Election officials will share the updated schedule on this list soon. Additionally, the TC approved the retirement of openstack-ansible roles for former projects: Murano (Application Catalog), Senlin (Clustering Service), and Sahara (Data Processing). The OpenInfra Board's Individual Member Director elections are currently underway [4]. If you are an OpenInfra Foundation member, please check your email for a ballot and participate. The election will conclude on Friday, 2025-01-17. === Weekly Meeting === The OpenStack TC resumed its regular weekly meeting schedule last week following a brief hiatus due to the year-end holidays. Last week's meeting was held on 2025-01-07 at 1800 UTC, simultaneously on Zoom and IRC. Please find the meeting minutes on eavesdrop [5] and a recording on YouTube [6]. The meeting began with a discussion about the pending proposal [7] to delete the "unmaintained/victoria" branch on OpenStack git repositories. There is interest from at least one contributing organization in keeping this branch open for specific repositories. The deadline to merge this change is 2025-01-31. We aim to identify the specific repositories and the responsible maintainers by then. I'll keep you updated in future emails. The TC then discussed initiating the election cycle for the 2025.2 release. We recognize that long holidays (such as the upcoming Chinese New Year) could impact nominations from interested candidates. We hope to encourage nominations as early as possible since even a couple of extra weeks could make a difference in coordinating for such a geographically diverse community. The TC also reviewed the status of the community goal to migrate test jobs to Python 3.12 (and "Ubuntu 24.04 / Noble Numbat" where applicable). Ghanshyam Mann (gmann), the goal champion, shared that test jobs in three projects (Heat, Skyline, and devstack-plugin-container) need attention from their respective project teams [8]. We also expressed our gratitude to the OpenDev Infrastructure team for keeping the systems running smoothly during the holidays. The next OpenStack Technical Committee meeting is today, 2025-01-14, at 1800 UTC. This meeting will be held over IRC in OFTC's #openstack-tc channel. Please find the agenda on the meeting wiki [9]. I hope you can join us. Remember, any community member can propose meeting topics—just mention your IRC nick so the meeting chair can call upon you. === Governance Proposals === ==== Merged ==== - Allow more than 2 weeks for elections | https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/governance/+/937741 - Put whitebox-tempest-plugin under release management | https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/governance/+/938401 - Retire Murano/Senlin/Sahara OpenStack-Ansible roles | https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/governance/+/935677 ==== Open for Review ==== - Rework the eventlet-removal goal proposal | https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/governance/+/931254 - Add ansible-role-httpd repo to OSA-owned projects | https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/governance/+/935694 - Retire Freezer DR | https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/governance/+/938183 - Retire qdrouterd role | https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/governance/+/938193 - Remove Freezer from inactive state | https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/governance/+/938938 - Propose to select the eventlet-removal community goal | https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/governance/+/934936 - Resolve to adhere to non-biased language | https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/governance/+/934907 === How to Contact the TC === You can reach the TC in several ways: - Email: Send an email with the tag [tc] on this mailing list. - Ping us using the 'tc-members' keyword on the #openstack-tc IRC channel on OFTC. - Join us at our weekly meeting: The Technical Committee meets every week on Tuesdays at 1800 UTC [9]. === Upcoming Events === - 2025-01-17: 2025 OpenInfra Board Individual Member Director Elections conclude - 2025-02-01: FOSDEM 2025 (https://fosdem.org/2025/) OpenStack's 15th Birthday Celebration - 2025-02-28: 2025.1 ("Epoxy") Feature Freeze and release milestone 3 [1] - 2025-03-06: SCALE 2025 + OpenInfra Days NA (https://www.socallinuxexpo.org/scale/22x) Thank you very much for reading! On behalf of the OpenStack TC, Goutham Pacha Ravi (gouthamr) OpenStack TC Chair [1] 2025.1 "Epoxy" Release Schedule: https://releases.openstack.org/epoxy/schedule.html [2] Release countdown for week R-11: https://lists.openstack.org/archives/list/openstack-discuss@lists.openstack… [3] OpenStack 2025.2 'F' Release Naming Poll: https://lists.openstack.org/archives/list/openstack-discuss@lists.openstack… [4] OpenInfra Foundation Board Elections: https://openinfra.dev/election/2025-individual-director-election [5] TC Meeting IRC Log 2025-01-07: https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/tc/2025/tc.2025-01-07-18.00.log.html [6] TC Meeting Video Recording, 2025-01-07: https://youtu.be/-Nxul8_ykto [7] Transition unmaintained/victoria to EOL: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/937515 [8] Projects failing the "migrate-to-noble" goal: https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/migrate-to-noble#L172 [9] TC Meeting Agenda, 2025-01-14: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/TechnicalCommittee#Next_Meeting

1 0

[openstack][octavia] Override default 50000 OctaviaTimeoutMemberData
by Andy Speagle 13 Jan '25

13 Jan '25

Hi Folks, We're using charmed openstack and charmed k8s on top of that. In our k8s environment, we have an nginx ingress controller that uses the openstack-integrator charm to create and manage octavia LBs. I'm trying to figure out how to manage the haproxy frontend and backend timeout parameters that seem to default to 50000ms via: OctaviaTimeoutClientData OctaviaTimeoutMemberData Ideally, being able to specify this in the k8s service manifest that gets passed down into the octavia config would be "the way." Any ideas? Thanks! -- Andy Speagle

1 1

Assigning specific IP address to a host
by William Muriithi 13 Jan '25

13 Jan '25

Hello I have a system that I would like to assign a specific IP address. I am aware of a way I can set it up on creation but want to change it post creation so that I can prepare the host before swapping the IP address to bring it to production. This is what I have tried:- Set up a second interface: openstack server add fixed ip --fixed-ip-address 192.168.20.61 f3a20bef-bb03-4e9a-8996-77567ef96ff0 d1051b62-46a7-487e-b188-f742aec6d711 Remove the default security group: openstack port unset --security-group c0108624-dbd8-42bb-acaa-bbbfd32fbbae 6978e153-47dc-42d4-bdb8-63b325c77cf0 Assign the relevant security group: openstack port set --security-group 415a6ef0-e461-41fc-85f0-c92c043e5b50 6978e153-47dc-42d4-bdb8-63b325c77cf0 After that, when I ssh to the virtual machine, I can see the new interface and indeed also ping/ssh to the system using that IP address. However, its not reachable from outside the virtual machine What could I be missing here? Regards, William

2 1

[Neutron] Bug report Jan 6 to Jan 12
by Rodolfo Alonso Hernandez 13 Jan '25

13 Jan '25

Hello Neutrinos: This is the bug report from the past week. *HIGH* * DVR flow is not installed for allowed address pairs mac in DVR_TO_SRC_MAC table=1 (https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/2093248) Patch proposed: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/neutron/+/938657 * [OVN] Port unbinding operation receives rogue port UP event too ( https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/2093327) *Not assigned*. * [ovn-octavia-provider] first request is stuck on OVN txn ( https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/2093347) Patch proposed: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ovn-octavia-provider/+/938797 *MEDIUM* * OVS Manager creation is failing at ovs-agent startup causing that values like inactivity_timeout are not set ( https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/2093433) Assigned. *LOW* * Missing Documentation for vpnaas with ovn ( https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/2093317) *Not assigned*. Regards.

1 0

[all][gate] Bandit version 1.8.1 issues
by Brian Haley 12 Jan '25

12 Jan '25

Hi Stackers, I was re-checking some simple Neutron changes and noticed our pep8 job started failing running bandit. Seems there was a new version (1.8.1) just released and it's generating false-positives [0]. I filed a bug against it at [1], and for now I'll just work around it by ignoring B106 warnings in Neutron with [2]. Didn't know if we wanted to pin/denylist it while the issue is addressed as I'm assuming others projects will start seeing the same failure. -Brian [0] https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/2093849 [1] https://github.com/PyCQA/bandit/issues/1216 [2] https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/neutron/+/939004

1 1

keystone concepts
by Budai Laszlo 12 Jan '25

12 Jan '25

Dear all, reading the keystone documentation (https://docs.openstack.org/keystone/latest/getting-started/architecture.html) we can see the following sentence: "|Projects| represent the base unit of |ownership| in OpenStack, in that all resources in OpenStack should be owned by a specific project." What are "resources" in the previous statement? Thank you in advance, Laszlo

2 3

keystone concepts
by Budai Laszlo 12 Jan '25

12 Jan '25

Dear all, reading the keystone documentation (https://docs.openstack.org/keystone/latest/getting-started/architecture.html) we can see the following sentence: "|Projects| represent the base unit of |ownership| in OpenStack, in that all resources in OpenStack should be owned by a specific project." What are "resources" in the previous statement? Thank you in advance, Laszlo

1 0