June 2024 - openstack-discuss - lists.openstack.org

[nova] Enabling UEFI for BFV instances
by Mohammed Naser 24 Jun '24

24 Jun '24

Hi everyone, I’m working on an open source tool right now which can do online migration of VMware instances to OpenStack. It uses VDDK and some other neat pieces of open source technology (nbdkit, libnbd, virt-v2v). It’s working great so far and I have a few challenges before release. When migrating a VM that was using UEFI in VMware, the VM will not boot inside OpenStack because it needs `hw_machine_type` to be set to `uefi`. However, the way that I’m doing migrations, I’m mounting a volume inside a migration “appliance VM” and copying data into it (to make it generic enough to work with all backends). Is there a way we can mark a volume as UEFI bootable by any chance so that Nova picks it up? Thanks, Mohammed

3 3

[swift][s3api] Same bucket object storage policy
by Rafael Tavares Oliveira 24 Jun '24

24 Jun '24

Hey there! We would very much like to allow multiple objects in the same bucket to have multiple storage policies, different from their container. Since we noticed that this is not possible now, we'd like to take a shot at it. But first, any suggestions or ideas on implementing this? The idea we are following here and trying to implement would be to use the same logic as the `+segments` bucket: each bucket would have a `+cold` counterpart, in the cold storage policy, which would store such objects, and we would keep a manifest/symlink in the original bucket, which we can use to retrieve the content from cold storage. Just as a piece of context, we are basing this solution on yoga release and using S3 apis mainly. Thanks for the help! Rafael

2 1

[oslo] Specs proposal to use cotyledon and futurist.
by Daniel Bengtsson 24 Jun '24

24 Jun '24

Hi there, Further to my previous mail, I have decided to create a specs proposal[1] within oslo. The idea is to use cotyledon and futurist in oslo.service and not to deprecate the project. Please don't hesitate to send me feedback. [1] https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/oslo-specs/+/922597 -- Daniel Bengtsson Software Engineer

2 2

Regarding Cinder- Volume error in OpenStack-ansible
by Adivya Singh 24 Jun '24

24 Jun '24

Hi Team, I am trying to configure the Cinder Volume service with NFS server as a backend and this is my user_variables File cinder_backends: default: volume_backend_name: nfs volume_driver: cinder.volume.drivers.nfs.NfsDriver nfs_shares_config: /etc/cinder/nfs_shares nfs_qcow2_volumes: true nfs_mount_options: vers=4,nfsvers=4,noatime,rw,bg,intr,async,timeo=60 nfs_snapshot_support: true shares: - ip: 172.29.244.103 share: /cinder/volume My NFS server Configuration is Like this /img/glance 172.29.244.0/22(rw,insecure,sync,no_subtree_check,no_root_squash) /cinder/volume 172.29.244.0/22(vrw,insecure,sync,no_subtree_check,no_root_squash) now what i am seeing is below error 2024-06-24 08:11:42.892 4807 ERROR cinder.volume.drivers.remotefs [None req-85e0d72a-f403-4c8e-8880-1ced0413f760 - - - - - -] Exception during mounting NFS mount failed for share 172.29.244.103:/cinder/volume. Error - {'nfs': "Unexpected error while running command.\nCommand: sudo cinder-rootwrap /etc/cinder/rootwrap.conf mount -t nfs -o vers=4,nfsvers=4,noatime,rw,bg,intr,async,timeo=60 172.29.244.103:/cinder/volume /var/lib/cinder/mnt/cd53d1ffa6d608fee908e8f1668ce63d\nExit code: 32\nStdout: ''\nStderr: 'mount.nfs: multiple version options not permitted\\n'"}: cinder.exception.NfsException: NFS mount failed for share 172.29.244.103:/cinder/volume. Error - {'nfs': "Unexpected error while running command.\nCommand: sudo cinder-rootwrap /etc/cinder/rootwrap.conf mount -t nfs -o vers=4,nfsvers=4,noatime,rw,bg,intr,async,timeo=60 172.29.244.103:/cinder/volume /var/lib/cinder/mnt/cd53d1ffa6d608fee908e8f1668ce63d\nExit code: 32\nStdout: ''\nStderr: 'mount.nfs: multiple version options not permitted\\n'"} Any clue on this, How to fix it Regards Adivya Singh

2 1

[barbican][openstack-helm][tacker] Request to Include Barbican Installation Guide in OpenStack-Helm Documentation
by JUSO WATARU(十楚　航) 21 Jun '24

21 Jun '24

Hello, We are presently in the process of enhancing the official OpenStack-Helm documentation by including a procedural guide for deploying Tacker using helmchart. Through discussions with members of the openstack-helm community, it has been emphasized that Barbican is an indispensable component for Tacker. Hence, it would be highly beneficial for users to have comprehensive instructions for installing Barbican with helmchart included in the official OpenStack-Helm documentation [1]. Consequently, we suggest that the Barbican community integrate the installation guide for the Barbican component into the official OpenStack-Helm documentation. This addition is poised to significantly enhance the clarity and accessibility of deployment procedures for users. We eagerly welcome your opinions and feedback on this proposal, as we aim to ensure that the documentation for openstack deployment with helmchart meets the needs of our community. [1] https://docs.openstack.org/openstack-helm/latest/install/openstack.html Regards, Wataru

2 2

[nova] Cannot (live)migrate due to host mismatch?
by sinan86polat＠gmail.com 20 Jun '24

20 Jun '24

Hello, When I try to live migrate a VM and specify a target host, I am getting the following: $ openstack server migrate <id> --live --os-compute-api-version 2.30 --host hypervisor-05 No valid host was found. There are not enough hosts available. (HTTP 400) (Request-ID: req-bee8f8b1-7218-4ae7-aa71-c4e5a3a84ba5) And the following is logged in nova-scheduler: No hosts matched due to not matching requested destination (hypervisor-05, hypervisor-05.sub.domain.com) When I do "openstack hypervisor list" I see my hypervisors with its fqdn (hypervisor-05.sub.domain.com) So, it might be a mismatch in the nova database? How do I verify and correct it?

2 2

[qa] Cancel office hour on odd weeks
by Martin Kopec 20 Jun '24

20 Jun '24

Hi everyone, I'm going to cancel office hours every odd week, at least during the summer, due to a small attendance. Office hours will be held biweekly every Tuesday (even weeks) at 15:00 UTC. The other time slot we had, Wednesday biweekly at 17:00 UTC (odd weeks), is cancelled for now. Thank you, -- Martin Kopec Principal Software Quality Engineer Red Hat EMEA IM: kopecmartin

1 0

[swift][ceph][radosgw] Swift container create error
by Jaime Ibar 20 Jun '24

20 Jun '24

Hi all, I'm setting up swift support but using radosgw dropin replacement. I have configured the following in ceph.conf rgw keystone api version = 3 rgw keystone url = https://keystone/v3 rgw keystone admin project = service rgw keystone admin domain = default rgw keystone service token enabled = true rgw keystone accepted roles = member, _member_, admin, swiftoperator rgw keystone implicit tenants = true rgw enable apis = swift, s3 rgw s3 auth use keystone = true but I'm getting the following error when creating a container > openstack container create test Unauthorized (HTTP 401) Does anyone what I'm missing? TIA Jaime -- salu2 Jaime

2 2

[openstack-ansible] [masakari]
by Budai Laszlo 19 Jun '24

19 Jun '24

Dear All, I'm evaluating Masakari for instance HA and I need to install it using openstack-ansible. I'm doing it initially in a small test cluster (3 controller, and 3 compute). The install went trough and now when I'm checking the status of the corosync cluster I see the following: root@worker1:~# crm_mon -1 Cluster Summary: * Stack: corosync * Current DC: worker2 (version 2.1.2-ada5c3b36e2) - partition with quorum * Last updated: Wed Jun 19 16:02:01 2024 * Last change: Wed Jun 19 15:29:37 2024 by hacluster via crmd on worker2 * 3 nodes configured * 0 resource instances configured Node List: * Online: [ worker1 worker2 worker3 ] Active Resources: * No active resources root@worker1:~# is it normal that there are no resources configured? What about the fencing, how should I configure it? Are you aware of any documentation where I could find mori info about configuring fencing (especially in the context of openstack-ansible)? Thank you for any advice. Kind regards, Laszlo

3 5

[largescale-sig] Next meeting: June 19, 9utc
by Thierry Carrez 19 Jun '24

19 Jun '24

Hi everyone, The Large Scale SIG will be meeting this Wednesday in #openstack-operators on OFTC IRC, at 9UTC. You can doublecheck how that UTC time translates locally at: https://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?iso=20240619T09 Feel free to add topics to the agenda: https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/large-scale-sig-meeting Regards, -- Thierry Carrez

2 1